-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12k
mtmd : add methods to access mtmd_image_tokens
#12906
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a46b6db
mtmd : add more api around mtmd_image_tokens
ngxson 7ac0b7b
mtmd : ability to calc image hash
ngxson 58c4767
shared_ptr for mtmd_image_tokens
ngxson d3c3e20
move hash to user-define ID (fixed)
ngxson cd5dc6b
fix prompt_modified
ngxson dbb257c
rm redundant data member
ngxson File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not 100% sure, but I think this logic does not handle the case where the text ends with an image marker:
For Gemma3 this will not happen because we wrap the image marker with text on both sides, but maybe for other models it could happen? If it cannot happen for sure, then this
if
should become assert.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current logic will produce an empty text chunk in the end if the image marker is placed at the end on the input prompt. This is an effect from
string_split_str
For example, this code:
Will output:
I think having an empty chunk in the end is expected for now, but I should document it better.If we don't want this empty chunk, the proper way is to stop usingstring_split_str
and to write our own code to do string matching / splitting.In reality, this will almost never happen because user always input a prompt with a generation prefix, something like
<s>user\nwhat do you see?<image></s><s>assistant\n
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I missed one line of code:
So that means there is no empty chunk being added, the case where image marker placed in the end is correctly handled. This also handles the case where 2 image markers are place one next to the other.
(This piece of code was firstly introduced from my first attempt to refactor vision API, so yeah it's quite hacky)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I will refactor this function later on. Could you review the rest of this PR? Thanks!!