Skip to content

Conversation

gimlichael
Copy link
Owner

@gimlichael gimlichael commented May 29, 2025

This pull request refactors the .github/workflows/pipelines.yml file to streamline job definitions, improve consistency, and fix minor issues. The most significant changes include replacing custom job steps with reusable workflows, correcting a syntax issue in matrix configuration, and updating job dependencies for deployment.

Refactoring and Reusability:

  • Replaced the prepare_linux and prepare_windows job definitions with reusable workflows (codebeltnet/jobs-dotnet-restore/.github/workflows/default.yml@v1). This change simplifies the workflow by consolidating shared logic.

Syntax Fixes:

  • Fixed a matrix configuration syntax issue by updating the restore-cache-key reference to use the correct format (restore-cache-key instead of restoreCacheKey).

Deployment Updates:

  • Updated the deploy job's needs property to include integration_test, ensuring all necessary dependencies are accounted for before deployment.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Streamlined workflow preparation steps for Linux and Windows by using reusable workflows.
    • Standardized input parameter naming in workflow jobs for consistency.
    • Updated build, pack, test, and integration test jobs to newer versions.
    • Enhanced deployment process by adding integration tests as a prerequisite.
    • Improved caching strategy in integration tests for better reliability.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this May 29, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 29, 2025

Walkthrough

This update refactors the GitHub Actions pipeline by replacing inline job steps for Linux and Windows preparation with reusable workflow calls. It standardizes output variable naming conventions, updates reusable workflow versions for build, pack, and test jobs, removes an unused input from the pack job, and modifies the deployment job's dependencies to include integration tests. The integration_test job now explicitly restores cache and downloads artifacts, and updates the dotnet-test action version.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml Refactored prepare_linux and prepare_windows jobs to use a reusable workflow; updated build, pack, and test jobs to use v2 reusable workflows; renamed input restoreCacheKey to restore-cache-key; removed upload-packed-artifact input from pack; updated integration_test job to use dotnet-test@v4 and kebab-case cache key; added cache restore and artifact download steps in integration_test; added integration_test to deploy job dependencies.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant ReusableWorkflow
    participant IntegrationTest

    Developer->>GitHub Actions: Push code / open PR
    GitHub Actions->>ReusableWorkflow: Run prepare_linux (use-restore-cache: true)
    GitHub Actions->>ReusableWorkflow: Run prepare_windows (use-restore-cache: true, runs-on: windows-2022)
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Run build, pack, test, sonarcloud, codecov, codeql
    GitHub Actions->>IntegrationTest: Run integration_test
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Deploy (after build, pack, test, integration_test, sonarcloud, codecov, codeql complete)
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • 👷 streamline pipeline #120: Both PRs refactor the .github/workflows/pipelines.yml by replacing inline job steps with reusable workflow calls and update job dependencies, including adding the integration_test job to the deploy job's needs array, indicating a direct and strong connection in pipeline restructuring.

Poem

In the warren where workflows hop and run,
Reusable steps now get the job done.
Linux and Windows, both neat and concise,
Integration tests join the deploy slice.
With kebab-case keys, the pipelines align—
A carrot for code, and results that shine! 🥕


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1b2f76 and 6e77d84.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: call-build (Debug) / 🛠️ Build
  • GitHub Check: call-build (Release) / 🛠️ Build
  • GitHub Check: 🪟 Prepare Windows / 🏷️ Restore

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f59eb02 and 78b82db.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (6)

26-29: Simplified Linux restore job with reusable workflow
The prepare_linux job now uses the centralized jobs-dotnet-restore workflow, eliminating duplicated checkout/install/restore steps. This improves maintainability and consistency.


32-36: Simplified Windows restore job with reusable workflow
Similarly, the prepare_windows job delegates to the same reusable workflow. By passing runs-on: windows-2022 as an input override, you maintain parity with the Linux job while ensuring the correct runner is used.


65-68: Upgrade build job to v2 and standardize cache-key input
The build job now references jobs-dotnet-build@v2 and correctly switches to kebab-case for the restore-cache-key input, matching the output naming from your restore step.


80-84: Upgrade pack job to v2, drop obsolete input, and rename cache-key
The pack job has been updated to jobs-dotnet-pack@v2, the unused upload-packed-artifact input removed, and the cache key input normalized to restore-cache-key.


95-100: Upgrade test job to v2 and align cache-key expression
The test job now invokes jobs-dotnet-test@v2. The expression for restore-cache-key has been adjusted to reference the kebab-case output from the appropriate prepare job based on OS.


187-187: Add integration_test as a deployment dependency
The deploy job now correctly waits for integration_test, ensuring that end-to-end tests pass before publishing packages.

Comment on lines 131 to 142
- name: Restore Cache
uses: actions/cache/restore@v4
with:
path: |
${{ github.workspace }}
!${{ github.workspace }}/.git
~/.nuget/packages
key: ${{ needs.prepare_linux.outputs.restoreCacheKey }}
restore-keys: |
dotnet-restore-
enableCrossOsArchive: true
fail-on-cache-miss: true
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix cache restore step in integration_test
There are two issues here that will block cache restoration:

  1. The official action is actions/cache@v4, not actions/cache/restore@v4.
  2. The output name should use kebab-case (restore-cache-key), not CamelCase (restoreCacheKey).

Apply this diff:

-      - name: Restore Cache
-        uses: actions/cache/restore@v4
+      - name: Restore Cache
+        uses: actions/cache@v4
         with:
           path: |
             ${{ github.workspace }}
             !${{ github.workspace }}/.git
             ~/.nuget/packages
-          key: ${{ needs.prepare_linux.outputs.restoreCacheKey }}
+          key: ${{ needs.prepare_linux.outputs.restore-cache-key }}
           restore-keys: |
             dotnet-restore-
           enableCrossOsArchive: true
           fail-on-cache-miss: true
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Restore Cache
uses: actions/cache/restore@v4
with:
path: |
${{ github.workspace }}
!${{ github.workspace }}/.git
~/.nuget/packages
key: ${{ needs.prepare_linux.outputs.restoreCacheKey }}
restore-keys: |
dotnet-restore-
enableCrossOsArchive: true
fail-on-cache-miss: true
- name: Restore Cache
uses: actions/cache@v4
with:
path: |
${{ github.workspace }}
!${{ github.workspace }}/.git
~/.nuget/packages
key: ${{ needs.prepare_linux.outputs.restore-cache-key }}
restore-keys: |
dotnet-restore-
enableCrossOsArchive: true
fail-on-cache-miss: true
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/pipelines.yml around lines 131 to 142, the cache restore
step uses an incorrect action name and output variable casing. Change the action
from 'actions/cache/restore@v4' to the correct 'actions/cache@v4'. Also, update
the output variable from 'restoreCacheKey' to 'restore-cache-key' to match
kebab-case naming conventions. These changes will fix the cache restoration
process.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.82%. Comparing base (e077271) to head (6e77d84).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #121      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.17%   79.82%   -0.35%     
==========================================
  Files         596      593       -3     
  Lines       18513    18283     -230     
  Branches     1902     1865      -37     
==========================================
- Hits        14843    14595     -248     
- Misses       3599     3618      +19     
+ Partials       71       70       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit b57def7 into main Jun 11, 2025
161 of 162 checks passed
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v9.0.6/pipeline-tweaks branch June 11, 2025 21:59
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant