Skip to content

Support VS 2022 #850

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
blu3mania opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Support VS 2022 #850

blu3mania opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@blu3mania
Copy link

blu3mania commented Dec 10, 2021

I updated one of my repositories to use VS 2022 and MSVC Tools v143 to build, and although I could use the latest "windows-2022" hosted runner to successfully build my solution, CodeQL failed. After digging around I found #821 which is the exact same issue, and from the linked support page it states that VS support is only up to 2019.

Can VS 2022 support be added? Thanks.

@blu3mania
Copy link
Author

For now I reverted my repository back to use VS 2019.

@hmakholm
Copy link
Contributor

hmakholm commented Dec 13, 2021

Yes, database creation on Windows Server 2022 is currently broken (no matter which release of Visual Studio). The system libraries in the OS update change some details that CodeQL was depending upon for observing what the build process does. We have some engineers working urgently on getting it to work, but it's complicated and we have no firm ETA for a fix yet. :-(

@hmakholm hmakholm added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 13, 2021
ahwm added a commit to ahwm/GodaddyWrapper.Net that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2022
disabling CodeQL due to lack of .NET 6 support: github/codeql-action#757 and github/codeql-action#850
blu3mania added a commit to blu3mania/npp-papyrus that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2022
baywet added a commit to microsoft/OpenAPI.NET.OData that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2022
pbatard added a commit to pbatard/ntfs-3g that referenced this issue May 30, 2022
Also drop CodeQL for the time being, as it is still not
compatible with VS2022 (github/codeql-action#850).
@hmakholm
Copy link
Contributor

This eventually got fixed.

ann0see added a commit to ann0see/jamulus that referenced this issue Jun 15, 2022
Fixes: jamulussoftware#2259
Visual Studio and CodeQl now work on windows-2022 according to github/codeql-action#850
ann0see added a commit to ann0see/jamulus that referenced this issue Jun 18, 2022
Fixes: jamulussoftware#2259
Visual Studio and CodeQl now work on windows-2022 according to 
github/codeql-action#850
pbatard added a commit to pbatard/rufus that referenced this issue Jun 23, 2022
* Also reinstate CodeQL since github/codeql-action#850 is supposed to be fixed and add dependabot.yml.
* Also fix a false Coverity warning.
pbatard added a commit to pbatard/rufus that referenced this issue Jun 23, 2022
* Also reinstate CodeQL since github/codeql-action#850 is supposed to be fixed.
* Also fix a false Coverity warning.
tuxgal added a commit to tuxgal/tuxlogi that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
There is lack of CodeQL VS/Win 2022 support.

Upstream Tracking bug(s):
github/codeql-action#850
github/codeql-action#821
tuxgal added a commit to tuxgal/tuxlog that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
tuxgal added a commit to tuxgal/cablemodemutil that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
There is lack of CodeQL VS/Win 2022 support.

Upstream Tracking bug(s):
github/codeql-action#850
github/codeql-action#821
tuxgal added a commit to tuxgal/cablemodemcli that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
There is lack of CodeQL VS/Win 2022 support.

Upstream Tracking bug(s):
github/codeql-action#850
github/codeql-action#821
tuxgal added a commit to tuxgal/prometheus_cable_modem_exporter that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2024
There is lack of CodeQL VS/Win 2022 support.

Upstream Tracking bug(s):
github/codeql-action#850
github/codeql-action#821
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants