-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 933
repo, cmd: DROP UNEEDED Win path for chcwd & check for '~' homedir #529
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's quite amazing that
communicate()
actually cannot be trusted or is simply not implemented correctly :/.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, you are quite right -
communicate()
CAN be trusted.I did a small experiment of reading a Gbyte, both in PY27 and PY35, and they do not block:
I don't remember when I got this mistrust for
communicate()
, maybe when I had tried PY33, or maybe when epxerimenting with interactive processes (like thegit.cmd.Git.cat-file
persistent command); there thecomminicate()
is not suitable because it will start consuming streams till the death of the process, but the process is awaiting for more input from python-side before ending, so it's a deadlock.One or two changes in my windows fixes were under this wrong assumption that
communicate()
should not be trusted. But mostly I replaced code accessing directlyproc.stderr/stdout
from the main thread - this is definitely freeze-prone code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A nice experiment ! It doesn't seem to output both on stdout and stderr though, which might be causing the problem we see. The implementation of communicate looks asynchronous, but who knows what's hidden in the details.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even when
stdout/stderr
is interplexed,communicate()
does not block (at least in PY3):For some "unicode" reason cannot run the above experiment in PY2.