User Issues page no longer shows issues in all repositories #28268
Labels
Comments
lunny
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 7, 2023
It will fix #28268 . <img width="1313" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/cb1e07d5-7a12-4691-a054-8278ba255bfc"> <img width="1318" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/4fd60820-97f1-4c2c-a233-d3671a5039e9"> ##⚠️ BREAKING⚠️ But need to give up some features: <img width="1312" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/281c0d51-0e7d-473f-bbed-216e2f645610"> However, such abandonment may fix #28055 . ## Backgroud When the user switches the dashboard context to an org, it means they want to search issues in the repos that belong to the org. However, when they switch to themselves, it means all repos they can access because they may have created an issue in a public repo that they don't own. <img width="286" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/182dcd5b-1c20-4725-93af-96e8dfae5b97"> It's a confusing design. Think about this: What does "In your repositories" mean when the user switches to an org? Repos belong to the user or the org? Whatever, it has been broken by #26012 and its following PRs. After the PR, it searches for issues in repos that the dashboard context user owns or has been explicitly granted access to, so it causes #28268. ## How to fix it It's not really difficult to fix it. Just extend the repo scope to search issues when the dashboard context user is the doer. Since the user may create issues or be mentioned in any public repo, we can just set `AllPublic` to true, which is already supported by indexers. The DB condition will also support it in this PR. But the real difficulty is how to count the search results grouped by repos. It's something like "search issues with this keyword and those filters, and return the total number and the top results. **Then, group all of them by repo and return the counts of each group.**" <img width="314" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/5206eb20-f8f5-49b9-b45a-1be2fcf679f4"> Before #26012, it was being done in the DB, but it caused the results to be incomplete (see the description of #26012). And to keep this, #26012 implement it in an inefficient way, just count the issues by repo one by one, so it cannot work when `AllPublic` is true because it's almost impossible to do this for all public repos. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/1bfcdeef4cca0f5509476358e5931c13d37ed1ca/modules/indexer/issues/indexer.go#L318-L338 ## Give up unnecessary features We may can resovle `TODO: use "group by" of the indexer engines to implement it`, I'm sure it can be done with Elasticsearch, but IIRC, Bleve and Meilisearch don't support "group by". And the real question is, does it worth it? Why should we need to know the counts grouped by repos? Let me show you my search dashboard on gitea.com. <img width="1304" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/2bca2d46-6c71-4de1-94cb-0c9af27c62ff"> I never think the long repo list helps anything. And if we agree to abandon it, things will be much easier. That is this PR. ## TODO I know it's important to filter by repos when searching issues. However, it shouldn't be the way we have it now. It could be implemented like this. <img width="1316" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/99ee5f21-cbb5-4dfe-914d-cb796cb79fbe"> The indexers support it well now, but it requires some frontend work, which I'm not good at. So, I think someone could help do that in another PR and merge this one to fix the bug first. Or please block this PR and help to complete it. Finally, "Switch dashboard context" is also a design that needs improvement. In my opinion, it can be accomplished by adding filtering conditions instead of "switching".
brechtvl
pushed a commit
to blender/gitea
that referenced
this issue
Dec 7, 2023
…8304) It will fix go-gitea#28268 . <img width="1313" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/cb1e07d5-7a12-4691-a054-8278ba255bfc"> <img width="1318" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/4fd60820-97f1-4c2c-a233-d3671a5039e9"> But need to give up some features: <img width="1312" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/281c0d51-0e7d-473f-bbed-216e2f645610"> However, such abandonment may fix go-gitea#28055 . When the user switches the dashboard context to an org, it means they want to search issues in the repos that belong to the org. However, when they switch to themselves, it means all repos they can access because they may have created an issue in a public repo that they don't own. <img width="286" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/182dcd5b-1c20-4725-93af-96e8dfae5b97"> It's a confusing design. Think about this: What does "In your repositories" mean when the user switches to an org? Repos belong to the user or the org? Whatever, it has been broken by go-gitea#26012 and its following PRs. After the PR, it searches for issues in repos that the dashboard context user owns or has been explicitly granted access to, so it causes go-gitea#28268. It's not really difficult to fix it. Just extend the repo scope to search issues when the dashboard context user is the doer. Since the user may create issues or be mentioned in any public repo, we can just set `AllPublic` to true, which is already supported by indexers. The DB condition will also support it in this PR. But the real difficulty is how to count the search results grouped by repos. It's something like "search issues with this keyword and those filters, and return the total number and the top results. **Then, group all of them by repo and return the counts of each group.**" <img width="314" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/5206eb20-f8f5-49b9-b45a-1be2fcf679f4"> Before go-gitea#26012, it was being done in the DB, but it caused the results to be incomplete (see the description of go-gitea#26012). And to keep this, go-gitea#26012 implement it in an inefficient way, just count the issues by repo one by one, so it cannot work when `AllPublic` is true because it's almost impossible to do this for all public repos. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/1bfcdeef4cca0f5509476358e5931c13d37ed1ca/modules/indexer/issues/indexer.go#L318-L338 We may can resovle `TODO: use "group by" of the indexer engines to implement it`, I'm sure it can be done with Elasticsearch, but IIRC, Bleve and Meilisearch don't support "group by". And the real question is, does it worth it? Why should we need to know the counts grouped by repos? Let me show you my search dashboard on gitea.com. <img width="1304" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/2bca2d46-6c71-4de1-94cb-0c9af27c62ff"> I never think the long repo list helps anything. And if we agree to abandon it, things will be much easier. That is this PR. I know it's important to filter by repos when searching issues. However, it shouldn't be the way we have it now. It could be implemented like this. <img width="1316" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/99ee5f21-cbb5-4dfe-914d-cb796cb79fbe"> The indexers support it well now, but it requires some frontend work, which I'm not good at. So, I think someone could help do that in another PR and merge this one to fix the bug first. Or please block this PR and help to complete it. Finally, "Switch dashboard context" is also a design that needs improvement. In my opinion, it can be accomplished by adding filtering conditions instead of "switching".
fuxiaohei
pushed a commit
to fuxiaohei/gitea
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2024
…8304) It will fix go-gitea#28268 . <img width="1313" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/cb1e07d5-7a12-4691-a054-8278ba255bfc"> <img width="1318" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/4fd60820-97f1-4c2c-a233-d3671a5039e9"> ##⚠️ BREAKING⚠️ But need to give up some features: <img width="1312" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/281c0d51-0e7d-473f-bbed-216e2f645610"> However, such abandonment may fix go-gitea#28055 . ## Backgroud When the user switches the dashboard context to an org, it means they want to search issues in the repos that belong to the org. However, when they switch to themselves, it means all repos they can access because they may have created an issue in a public repo that they don't own. <img width="286" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/182dcd5b-1c20-4725-93af-96e8dfae5b97"> It's a confusing design. Think about this: What does "In your repositories" mean when the user switches to an org? Repos belong to the user or the org? Whatever, it has been broken by go-gitea#26012 and its following PRs. After the PR, it searches for issues in repos that the dashboard context user owns or has been explicitly granted access to, so it causes go-gitea#28268. ## How to fix it It's not really difficult to fix it. Just extend the repo scope to search issues when the dashboard context user is the doer. Since the user may create issues or be mentioned in any public repo, we can just set `AllPublic` to true, which is already supported by indexers. The DB condition will also support it in this PR. But the real difficulty is how to count the search results grouped by repos. It's something like "search issues with this keyword and those filters, and return the total number and the top results. **Then, group all of them by repo and return the counts of each group.**" <img width="314" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/5206eb20-f8f5-49b9-b45a-1be2fcf679f4"> Before go-gitea#26012, it was being done in the DB, but it caused the results to be incomplete (see the description of go-gitea#26012). And to keep this, go-gitea#26012 implement it in an inefficient way, just count the issues by repo one by one, so it cannot work when `AllPublic` is true because it's almost impossible to do this for all public repos. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/1bfcdeef4cca0f5509476358e5931c13d37ed1ca/modules/indexer/issues/indexer.go#L318-L338 ## Give up unnecessary features We may can resovle `TODO: use "group by" of the indexer engines to implement it`, I'm sure it can be done with Elasticsearch, but IIRC, Bleve and Meilisearch don't support "group by". And the real question is, does it worth it? Why should we need to know the counts grouped by repos? Let me show you my search dashboard on gitea.com. <img width="1304" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/2bca2d46-6c71-4de1-94cb-0c9af27c62ff"> I never think the long repo list helps anything. And if we agree to abandon it, things will be much easier. That is this PR. ## TODO I know it's important to filter by repos when searching issues. However, it shouldn't be the way we have it now. It could be implemented like this. <img width="1316" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/99ee5f21-cbb5-4dfe-914d-cb796cb79fbe"> The indexers support it well now, but it requires some frontend work, which I'm not good at. So, I think someone could help do that in another PR and merge this one to fix the bug first. Or please block this PR and help to complete it. Finally, "Switch dashboard context" is also a design that needs improvement. In my opinion, it can be accomplished by adding filtering conditions instead of "switching".
silverwind
pushed a commit
to silverwind/gitea
that referenced
this issue
Feb 20, 2024
…8304) It will fix go-gitea#28268 . <img width="1313" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/cb1e07d5-7a12-4691-a054-8278ba255bfc"> <img width="1318" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/4fd60820-97f1-4c2c-a233-d3671a5039e9"> ##⚠️ BREAKING⚠️ But need to give up some features: <img width="1312" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/281c0d51-0e7d-473f-bbed-216e2f645610"> However, such abandonment may fix go-gitea#28055 . ## Backgroud When the user switches the dashboard context to an org, it means they want to search issues in the repos that belong to the org. However, when they switch to themselves, it means all repos they can access because they may have created an issue in a public repo that they don't own. <img width="286" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/182dcd5b-1c20-4725-93af-96e8dfae5b97"> It's a confusing design. Think about this: What does "In your repositories" mean when the user switches to an org? Repos belong to the user or the org? Whatever, it has been broken by go-gitea#26012 and its following PRs. After the PR, it searches for issues in repos that the dashboard context user owns or has been explicitly granted access to, so it causes go-gitea#28268. ## How to fix it It's not really difficult to fix it. Just extend the repo scope to search issues when the dashboard context user is the doer. Since the user may create issues or be mentioned in any public repo, we can just set `AllPublic` to true, which is already supported by indexers. The DB condition will also support it in this PR. But the real difficulty is how to count the search results grouped by repos. It's something like "search issues with this keyword and those filters, and return the total number and the top results. **Then, group all of them by repo and return the counts of each group.**" <img width="314" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/5206eb20-f8f5-49b9-b45a-1be2fcf679f4"> Before go-gitea#26012, it was being done in the DB, but it caused the results to be incomplete (see the description of go-gitea#26012). And to keep this, go-gitea#26012 implement it in an inefficient way, just count the issues by repo one by one, so it cannot work when `AllPublic` is true because it's almost impossible to do this for all public repos. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/1bfcdeef4cca0f5509476358e5931c13d37ed1ca/modules/indexer/issues/indexer.go#L318-L338 ## Give up unnecessary features We may can resovle `TODO: use "group by" of the indexer engines to implement it`, I'm sure it can be done with Elasticsearch, but IIRC, Bleve and Meilisearch don't support "group by". And the real question is, does it worth it? Why should we need to know the counts grouped by repos? Let me show you my search dashboard on gitea.com. <img width="1304" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/2bca2d46-6c71-4de1-94cb-0c9af27c62ff"> I never think the long repo list helps anything. And if we agree to abandon it, things will be much easier. That is this PR. ## TODO I know it's important to filter by repos when searching issues. However, it shouldn't be the way we have it now. It could be implemented like this. <img width="1316" alt="image" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/99ee5f21-cbb5-4dfe-914d-cb796cb79fbe"> The indexers support it well now, but it requires some frontend work, which I'm not good at. So, I think someone could help do that in another PR and merge this one to fix the bug first. Or please block this PR and help to complete it. Finally, "Switch dashboard context" is also a design that needs improvement. In my opinion, it can be accomplished by adding filtering conditions instead of "switching".
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Description
To reproduce:
If the user owns the repository or is a member of a team with access it will show the issues. But it's useful to e.g. see all bugs you reported to projects you are not a member of.
This was caused by #26545. That fixed a bug when a team is selected but probably should not have affected the case where a user is selected?
Gitea Version
4d7c063 (latest main)
Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site?
Yes
Log Gist
No response
Screenshots
No response
Git Version
No response
Operating System
No response
How are you running Gitea?
Own build.
Database
SQLite
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: