Skip to content

Artifact deletion in actions ui#27172

Merged
lunny merged 21 commits intogo-gitea:mainfrom
fuxiaohei:feat/artifact-deletion
Feb 18, 2024
Merged

Artifact deletion in actions ui#27172
lunny merged 21 commits intogo-gitea:mainfrom
fuxiaohei:feat/artifact-deletion

Conversation

@fuxiaohei
Copy link
Contributor

@fuxiaohei fuxiaohei commented Sep 21, 2023 •
edited by lunny
Loading

Add deletion link in runs view page.
Fix #26315

image

When click deletion button. It marks this artifact need-delete.

This artifact would be deleted when actions cleanup cron task.

@GiteaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

GiteaBot commented Sep 21, 2023

@fuxiaohei I noticed you've updated the locales for non-English languages. These will be overwritten during the sync from our translation tool Crowdin. If you'd like to contribute your translations, please visit https://crowdin.com/project/gitea. Please revert the changes done on these files. 🍵

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI label Sep 21, 2023
silverwind
silverwind reviewed Sep 21, 2023
View reviewed changes
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.22.0 milestone Sep 21, 2023
@lunny lunny added type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality topic/gitea-actions related to the actions of Gitea labels Sep 21, 2023
@fuxiaohei fuxiaohei force-pushed the feat/artifact-deletion branch from 63d582a to 5646de0 Compare September 22, 2023 11:54
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/M and removed size/L labels Sep 22, 2023
lunny
lunny reviewed Sep 23, 2023
View reviewed changes
lunny
lunny reviewed Sep 23, 2023
View reviewed changes
silverwind
silverwind reviewed Sep 29, 2023
View reviewed changes
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/L and removed size/M labels Oct 17, 2023
silverwind
silverwind reviewed Oct 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
silverwind
silverwind reviewed Oct 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
silverwind
silverwind reviewed Oct 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
silverwind
silverwind reviewed Oct 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
silverwind
silverwind reviewed Oct 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
@silverwind
Copy link
Member

silverwind commented Oct 17, 2023

Overall LGTM after above translation change.

@fuxiaohei fuxiaohei requested a review from delvh January 17, 2024 14:44
lunny
lunny reviewed Jan 19, 2024
View reviewed changes
@silverwind
Copy link
Member

silverwind commented Feb 15, 2024

Still waiting on @delvh?

delvh
delvh reviewed Feb 15, 2024
View reviewed changes
@fuxiaohei
Copy link
Contributor Author

fuxiaohei commented Feb 18, 2024

@delvh continue to review?

@delvh delvh added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Feb 18, 2024
@lunny lunny enabled auto-merge (squash) February 18, 2024 10:02
@lunny lunny merged commit 67adc5c into go-gitea:main Feb 18, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Feb 18, 2024
wxiaoguang
wxiaoguang reviewed Feb 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
services/actions/cleanup.go
Comment on lines +62 to +65
if err := storage.ActionsArtifacts.Delete(artifact.StoragePath); err != nil {
log.Error("Cannot delete artifact %d: %v", artifact.ID, err)
continue
}
Copy link
Contributor

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang Feb 18, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the file doesn't exist in the storage (eg: site admin deleted them manually), this function won't function anymore (always "continue", and then will be a deadloop if there are a lot pending but non-existing items)

Copy link
Contributor

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang Feb 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

-> Skip deletion error #33476

zjjhot added a commit to zjjhot/gitea that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2024
@zjjhot
Merge remote-tracking branch 'giteaofficial/main'
530f74f 
* giteaofficial/main: (28 commits)
  Improve TrHTML and add more tests (go-gitea#29228)
  Convert visibility to number (go-gitea#29226)
  Implement some action notifier functions (go-gitea#29173)
  Artifact deletion in actions ui (go-gitea#27172)
  Update docs for actions variables (go-gitea#29239)
  Refactor more code in templates  (go-gitea#29236)
  Use "Safe" modifier for manually constructed safe HTML strings in templates (go-gitea#29227)
  Remove jQuery from the repo release form (go-gitea#29225)
  Make submit event code work with both jQuery event and native event (go-gitea#29223)
  Remove jQuery from repo migrate page (go-gitea#29219)
  Remove unneccesary `initUserAuthLinkAccountView` from "link account" page (go-gitea#29217)
  Fix labels referencing the wrong ID in the user profile settings (go-gitea#29199)
  Fix label `for` pointing to a `name` instead of `id` in webhook settings (go-gitea#29209)
  Load outdated comments when (un)resolving conversation on PR timeline (go-gitea#29203)
  Fix missing template for follow button in organization (go-gitea#29215)
  Enable markdownlint `no-trailing-punctuation` and `no-blanks-blockquote` (go-gitea#29214)
  Remove jQuery from the webhook editor (go-gitea#29211)
  Remove jQuery from issue reference context popup attach (go-gitea#29216)
  fix typo (go-gitea#29212)
  Fix debian InRelease Acquire-By-Hash newline (go-gitea#29204)
  ...
@fuxiaohei fuxiaohei mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2024
Merged
lunny pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2024
@fuxiaohei
Expire artifacts before deleting them physically (#29241)
68e1d17 
#27172 (comment)

When cleanup artifacts, it removes storage first. If storage is not
exist (maybe delete manually), it gets error and continue loop. It makes
a dead loop if there are a lot pending but non-existing artifacts.

Now it updates db record at first to avoid keep a lot of pending status
artifacts.
silverwind pushed a commit to silverwind/gitea that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
@fuxiaohei @silverwind
Artifact deletion in actions ui (go-gitea#27172)
92d14a2 
Add deletion link in runs view page.
Fix go-gitea#26315


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2142787/aa65a4ab-f434-4deb-b953-21e63c212033)

When click deletion button. It marks this artifact `need-delete`.

This artifact would be deleted when actions cleanup cron task.
silverwind pushed a commit to silverwind/gitea that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
@fuxiaohei @silverwind
Expire artifacts before deleting them physically (go-gitea#29241)
658723f 
go-gitea#27172 (comment)

When cleanup artifacts, it removes storage first. If storage is not
exist (maybe delete manually), it gets error and continue loop. It makes
a dead loop if there are a lot pending but non-existing artifacts.

Now it updates db record at first to avoid keep a lot of pending status
artifacts.
DennisRasey pushed a commit to DennisRasey/forgejo that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
@fuxiaohei @algernon
Expire artifacts before deleting them physically (#29241)
7f64e4d 
go-gitea/gitea#27172 (comment)

When cleanup artifacts, it removes storage first. If storage is not
exist (maybe delete manually), it gets error and continue loop. It makes
a dead loop if there are a lot pending but non-existing artifacts.

Now it updates db record at first to avoid keep a lot of pending status
artifacts.
6543 pushed a commit to 6543-forks/gitea that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
@fuxiaohei @algernon
Artifact deletion in actions ui (go-gitea#27172)
c551d3f 
Add deletion link in runs view page.
Fix go-gitea#26315

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2142787/aa65a4ab-f434-4deb-b953-21e63c212033)

When click deletion button. It marks this artifact `need-delete`.

This artifact would be deleted when actions cleanup cron task.
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Automatically locked because of our CONTRIBUTING guidelines

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 28, 2024
wxiaoguang
wxiaoguang reviewed Apr 21, 2024
View reviewed changes
routers/web/web.go
m.Post("/approve", reqRepoActionsWriter, actions.Approve)
m.Post("/artifacts", actions.ArtifactsView)
m.Get("/artifacts/{artifact_name}", actions.ArtifactsDownloadView)
m.Delete("/artifacts/{artifact_name}", actions.ArtifactsDeleteView)
Copy link
Contributor

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang Apr 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it require reqRepoActionsWriter permission?

Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny Apr 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. The check is in the function ArtifactsDeleteView internal code but not here. It's better to move it out of that function.

Copy link
Contributor

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang Feb 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

-> chore: fix some trivial problems and TODOs #33473

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@lunny lunny lunny approved these changes

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang wxiaoguang left review comments

@silverwind silverwind silverwind approved these changes

@delvh delvh delvh approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/translation topic/gitea-actions related to the actions of Gitea topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.22.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow deleting artefacts from the UI

6 participants

@fuxiaohei @GiteaBot @silverwind @lunny @wxiaoguang @delvh