add comment for io.CopyBuffer

[sandyskies]

The follow is the comment for io.CopyBuffer,
// CopyBuffer is identical to Copy except that it stages through the
// provided buffer (if one is required) rather than allocating a
// temporary one. If buf is nil, one is allocated; otherwise if it has
// zero length, CopyBuffer panics.
func CopyBuffer(dst Writer, src Reader, buf []byte) (written int64, err error)

which is not precise enough, in the case of src implements the WriterTo interface or the case of if dst implements the ReaderFrom interface , buf will be ignore ,which is not mentioned at all. Which is very easy to lead people to wrong way.
Instead, add
// If src implements the WriterTo interface,
// the copy is implemented by calling src.WriteTo(dst).
// Otherwise, if dst implements the ReaderFrom interface,
// the copy is implemented by calling dst.ReadFrom(src). In both cases,
//buf will be ignored and will not be use.

fixed #32276

[googlebot]

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and have the pull request author add another comment and the bot will run again. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.