fix: 'NoneType' object is not iterable

[ananthanarayanan-28]

Link to Issue or Description of Change

1. Link to an existing issue (if applicable):

• Closes: TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable #3987
• Related: Background execution error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'update_timestamp_tz' #3596

2. Or, if no issue exists, describe the change:

Problem:
Idea about my use case
I'm building the report generation system using google-ask (1.18.0) and building multiple subagents here, I'm passing the one subagent Agent as a tool to another Parent Agent. Note: Sub-agent can do web search.
here, parent agent triggers multiple sub-agent (same agent) multiple times according to use case or complexity of the user input

Describe the bug
here, the bug sometimes sub agents doesn't provide the proper output and resulted in the

merged_text = '\n'.join(p.text for p in last_content.parts if p.text)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable
and it's breaking the system of Agents workflow

Solution:
Creating fallback if there is no last_content.parts it will return the empty parts so we won't face the NoneType issue

Testing Plan

Created a unit test file for this issue
test_google_search_agent_tool_repro.py

Unit Tests:

• I have added or updated unit tests for my change.
• All unit tests pass locally.

Please include a summary of passed pytest results.
3677 passed, 2208 warnings in 42.64s

Manual End-to-End (E2E) Tests:
N/A

Checklist

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
• I have performed a self-review of my own code.
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.
• I have manually tested my changes end-to-end.
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.

Additional context

N/A

[google-cla]

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @ananthanarayanan-28, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a critical TypeError that could arise in agent tools when processing responses where the last_content.parts attribute was unexpectedly None. The change implements a more resilient handling of potentially null content parts, ensuring that the system gracefully processes such cases instead of crashing. This significantly improves the stability of agent workflows, particularly when sub-agents might return incomplete or malformed outputs.

Highlights

• Bug Fix: Addresses a TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable that occurred when last_content.parts was None in agent tool responses, preventing agent workflow failures.
• Robustness Improvement: Introduces a fallback mechanism to ensure last_content.parts is treated as an empty iterable if it's None, and safely extracts text attributes using getattr.
• New Unit Test: Adds a dedicated unit test (test_google_search_agent_tool_repro.py) to specifically reproduce and verify the fix for the NoneType issue.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request fixes a TypeError that occurs when last_content.parts is None. The fix involves checking for None and providing an empty list as a fallback. A unit test is also added to verify the fix.

My review focuses on simplifying the implementation. The current change, while effective, introduces unnecessary complexity and a subtle change in behavior regarding the handling of empty strings. I've suggested a more concise and readable implementation that preserves the original logic while still fixing the bug. The changes are duplicated across two files, and my feedback applies to both.