Add two cost parameters for each vehicle type #2545
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
I really don't think you want to go there :-) Instead, choose a lower
overall operating cost for the hybrid.
That keeps the modeling easy, and it also better reflects reality: your
typical hybrid car experience is not "electric for these 5 miles, then gas
for the next 5" but a blend as the car turns the engine off and on all the
time (speaking as a former Prius owner). Similarly for planes, which burn
fuel at different rates depending on altitude and speed: you *could*
attempt to model that, and even make those decision variables, but you'd be
upping the complexity of your problem so much that it changes how you'd
solve it.
Jon
…On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 7:27 AM tcokyasar44 ***@***.***> wrote:
Just to increase the complexity, how about adding two different cost
parameters for the same vehicle type? For example, a hybrid vehicle runs
the first x distance/time on EV-mode, and hence the cost is lower than the
distance/time after x. Meanwhile, another vehicle type with a fixed cost
can be a benchmark. Is it possible to model this?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2545>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACFCEWZKM5LYSSJ3QU4MYFTTNZLA7ANCNFSM445ZQKQQ>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Answer selected by
tcokyasar44
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Just to increase the complexity, how about adding two different cost parameters for the same vehicle type? For example, a hybrid vehicle runs the first x distance/time on EV-mode, and hence the cost is lower than the distance/time after x. Meanwhile, another vehicle type with a fixed cost can be a benchmark. Is it possible to model this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions