Fixed Cost behaves oddly #951
Description
Seems that vehicle FixedCost is evaluated vs. a single Node's disjunction penalty: if the FixedCost is slightly higher the vehicle is not used and similarly no vehicle was used and all Nodes were dropped.
10 Vehicles, 80 Orders.
If Solver would have allocated the vehicle, it would server multiple Nodes and reduce penalty substantially.
When FixedCost was even a bit lower than disjunction penalty (of one Node) all necessary vehicles were allocated and served the Nodes.
Looks like the criteria to allocate was just based one vehicle vs. one Node. Correct?
If I'm not wrong, this creates undesired results.