Skip to content

Upgrade to 0.29.0 of google-cloud-bigquery #112

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2018

Conversation

tswast
Copy link
Collaborator

@tswast tswast commented Jan 26, 2018

Version 0.29.0 of google-cloud-bigquery deprecates Client.list_dataset_tables() in favor of Client.list_tables().

Build running at https://travis-ci.org/tswast/pandas-gbq/builds/333856912

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 26, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #112 into master will decrease coverage by 46.25%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #112       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   74.04%   27.78%   -46.26%     
===========================================
  Files           4        4               
  Lines        1537     1537               
===========================================
- Hits         1138      427      -711     
- Misses        399     1110      +711
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas_gbq/gbq.py 18.69% <0%> (-58.62%) ⬇️
pandas_gbq/tests/test_gbq.py 26.86% <0%> (-55.53%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 336fd78...0478f4f. Read the comment docs.

@parthea parthea merged commit 183daf1 into googleapis:master Jan 26, 2018
@parthea
Copy link
Contributor

parthea commented Jan 26, 2018

LGTM. Thanks @tswast !

@tswast tswast deleted the gcb-0.29.0 branch January 26, 2018 20:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants