Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
At Grafana, we do the latter, render yaml in CI and let Flux handle the rest. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
Thanks! Why not save the export in a folder in the same repo rather than a
different one?
…On Fri, Mar 10, 2023, 1:33 PM Duologic ***@***.***> wrote:
In general it's tk export and commit that to git, every commit to master
on the source has a commit on the master of the repo containing the export.
CI gets serialized to prevent race conditions. PRs create branches on the
export repo and the CI job comments a link to diff the output, this gives a
very useful feedback loop.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#740 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADDZTBJLNDCUT2URVL64RS3W3OM2HANCNFSM556LBRVA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey guys,
Like the project, but I was thinking if there are any plans about developing Tanka operator(for example as an extension to flux ecosystem)?
Currently the only way I can see this happening is having a CI that exports manifests and commits them(then flux takes over).
Let me know what you think
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions