Specify --tasty-cutoff test option via Haskell.Nix explicitly
#178
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is unfortunately necessary since it is not picked up from `cabal.project`. See: input-output-hk/haskell.nix#1149 (comment).
Member
|
Can you push an additional commit that breaks the golden tests to ensure this is working as expected in Hydra builds? And then, if it does work as expected, just force-push the original commit again before running Bors? |
Member
|
Excellent, this appears to work perfectly. Go for it! |
georgefst
force-pushed
the
georgefst/tasty-cutoff-nix-manual
branch
from
375170b to
922e651
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
bors merge |
|
Build succeeded: |
ghost
merged commit
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is unfortunately necessary since it is not picked up from
cabal.project. See: input-output-hk/haskell.nix#1149 (comment).Closes #173.