[New Resource] azurerm_machine_learning_workspace_network_outbound_rule_service_tag

[xuzhang3]

Community Note

• Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
• Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

Add support for Machine Learning Workspace Service Tag Network Outbound Rule :

• FQDN
• Private Endpoint
• Service Tag azurerm_machine_learning_workspace_network_outbound_rule_service_tag

=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport (501.71s)
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic (503.93s)
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update (633.45s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/machinelearning       636.420s

PR Checklist

• I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
• I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
• I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
• I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
• I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
  For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here”

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

• I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
• I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
• I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
• (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

• My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

• azurerm_resource - support for the thing1 property [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

• Bug Fix
• New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
• Enhancement
• Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #0000

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

[xuzhang3]

[katbyte]

we have some test failures:

[xuzhang3]

Local test passed. The API throttling not happed in my test env. Will retry running the test

= RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic
=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport (510.05s)
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic (530.12s)
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update (603.31s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/machinelearning       606.521s

[xuzhang3]

All tests passed

[stephybun]

This should never be set in acceptance tests

Suggested change

	resource_group {
	prevent_deletion_if_contains_resources = false
	}

[catriona-m]

Thanks @xuzhang3 I had a look through this and spotted a few minor things that I commented inline, but once those are fixed up I can take another look. Thanks!

[catriona-m]

Suggested change

	* `port_ranges` - (Required) Specifies which ports traffic will be allowed by this rule. Provide a single port, such as 80; a port range, such as 1024-655535; or a comma-separated list of single ports and/or port ranges, such as 80,1024-655535. Provide an asterisk(*) to allow traffic on any port.
	* `port_ranges` - (Required) Specifies which ports traffic will be allowed by this rule. You can specify a single port (e.g. ` 80`) , a port range (e.g. `1024-655535`) or a comma-separated list of single ports and/or port ranges(e.g. `80,1024-655535`). `*` can be used to allow traffic on any port.

[xuzhang3]

Thanks @xuzhang3 I had a look through this and spotted a few minor things that I commented inline, but once those are fixed up I can take another look. Thanks!

Thanks for reviewing, updated as suggested

[catriona-m]

Thanks @xuzhang3 this is looking good now, however it appears there are some conflicts needing resolved before this can be merged.

[stephybun]

Thanks @xuzhang3 LGTM 👍

Resolved

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.