Conversation
25eb9cd to
a559b8f
Compare
jbardin
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport
This PR is auto-generated from #36619 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label 1.11-backport.
The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.
The filtering of ephemeral marks for the planned value was incorrectly using
PathsWithMark, which only reports paths containing a specific mark or not, and can't account for multiple marks on a particular path. Create amarks.RemoveAllfunction which allows for correct filtering.Fixes #36603
Target Release
v1.11
Overview of commits
1105f16
ad6cbd6
64c68a0
fdf25b6