You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When building my language-xats library with GHCJS the following occurs:
vanessa@thinkpad ~/programming/haskell/current/language-xats 🌸 cabal new-build --ghcjs
Warning: don't know how to find change monitoring files for the installed
package databases for ghcjs
Resolving dependencies...
Build profile: -w ghcjs-8.4.0.1 -O1
In order, the following will be built (use -v for more details):
- alex-3.2.4 (exe:alex) (requires build)
- happy-1.19.9 (exe:happy) (requires build)
- prettyprinter-1.2.1 (lib) (requires build)
- language-xats-0.1.0.0 (lib) (first run)
Starting prettyprinter-1.2.1 (lib)
Starting alex-3.2.4 (exe:alex)
Starting happy-1.19.9 (all, legacy fallback)
Building prettyprinter-1.2.1 (lib)
Building alex-3.2.4 (exe:alex)
Installing prettyprinter-1.2.1 (lib)
Completed prettyprinter-1.2.1 (lib)
Installing alex-3.2.4 (exe:alex)
Completed alex-3.2.4 (exe:alex)
Building happy-1.19.9 (all, legacy fallback)
Installing happy-1.19.9 (all, legacy fallback)
Completed happy-1.19.9 (all, legacy fallback)
Configuring library for language-xats-0.1.0.0..
cabal: The program 'alex' is required but it could not be found.
The build succeeds when I run cabal new-install alex ; cabal new-install happy.
I think that cabal should attempt to install happy and alex using GHC. I can't really see any reason that we'd want to use a node version of happy or a cross-compiled version of happy as they are preprocessors.
Yes, the fundamental issue here is that currently everything starting with cabal's solver only support a single compiler at a time. You can only pass it a single --with-compiler (and with a single compiler-type, e.g. --ghcjs/--ghc).
When building my language-xats library with GHCJS the following occurs:
The build succeeds when I run
cabal new-install alex ; cabal new-install happy
.I think that
cabal
should attempt to installhappy
andalex
using GHC. I can't really see any reason that we'd want to use a node version ofhappy
or a cross-compiled version ofhappy
as they are preprocessors.I believe this has been mentioned before: #4939
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: