Skip to content

Add checkVersion for added fields #4893

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2017
Merged

Conversation

angerman
Copy link
Collaborator

As pointed out by @hvr, #4857, #4875 did not contain the necessary "check" logic. This PR tries to address this shortcoming.

Please include the following checklist in your PR:

  • Patches conform to the coding conventions.
  • Any changes that could be relevant to users have been recorded in the changelog.
  • The documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • If the change is docs-only, [ci skip] is used to avoid triggering the build bots.

Please also shortly describe how you tested your change. Bonus points for added tests!

…res, extra-library-flavours, and virtual-modules.

As pointed out by @hvr, haskell#4857, haskell#4875 did not contain the necessary "check" logic. This PR tries to address this shortcoming.
@23Skidoo
Copy link
Member

That's what happens when we don't write tests for new features... Thanks to @hvr for spotting this.

@23Skidoo 23Skidoo merged commit 60c4ba9 into haskell:master Nov 15, 2017
@23Skidoo
Copy link
Member

Merged, thanks!

, extraLibFlavours ])) $
PackageDistInexcusable $
"The use of 'asm-sources', 'cmm-sources', 'extra-bundled-libraries' "
++ " and 'virtual-modules' requires the package "
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, looks like you need to s/virtual-modules/extra-library-flavours/ here. Feel free to commit directly to master.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wow. How the hell did that happen? Ok... I'll just edit it on GH.

@angerman
Copy link
Collaborator Author

So this PR supposedly broke Travis. That has two implications:
a) that Travis seems to not react to quite a lot of PRs is pretty bad.
b) It broke on Travis due to: The job exceeded the maximum time limit for jobs, and has been terminated., which isn't that helpful either.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants