BuildClient: Add simple retry policy for failed doc builds - #544
Conversation
|
Currently I lack a plan for testing this. |
I've been noticing a fair number of Hackage packages lacking documentation due to apparently transient issues (e.g. somehow a package entering the build queue despite having no entry in the package index, see haskell#543). Here we add a simple retry policy; attempting to build a failing package up to a given number of attempts. The number of failures is now persisted in the failure file.
bdd72fa to
a8c1073
Compare
Due to caching sometimes the package repository state may lag behind the documentation index. Consequently, we make sure that the packages we are going to build actually appear in the repository before building. See Issue haskell#543.
a8c1073 to
1c1472c
Compare
bgamari
changed the title
| bo_username = flagUsername flags, | ||
| bo_password = flagPassword flags | ||
| bo_password = flagPassword flags, | ||
| bo_buildAttempts = fromMaybe 10 $ flagBuildAttempts flags |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
seems a little high as a default, no?
| parseRepositoryIndices = do | ||
| cabalDir <- getAppUserDataDirectory "cabal/packages" | ||
| cacheDirs <- listDirectory cabalDir | ||
| indexFiles <- filterM doesFileExist $ map (\dir -> cabalDir </> dir </> "00-index.cache") cacheDirs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This format is actually private to cabal, and does change (it's already changed in cabal-install-1.25). On the other hand the 00-index.tar or the 01-index.tar is a stable format. You can use the code from the mirror client (in the same repo) for this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
otoh, the on-disk format for 00-index.cache is supposed to remain backward compatible, otherwise different cabal clients would step on each other's toe ... For 01-index.cache it's a different story though :-)
|
|
||
| -- | Parse the @00-index.cache@ file of the available package repositories. | ||
| parseRepositoryIndices :: IO (S.Set PackageIdentifier) | ||
| parseRepositoryIndices = do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note that this will likely break for secure repos as the filename and on-disk format for 01-index.* changed
In future cabal versions we should extend or add a cabal list variant that dumps the required information (including additional meta-data such as revision number and/or last-revision-timestamp, and maybe also repository provenance) so that we don't need to understand the .cache format
|
Modulo comments above, the change to add retries and to make sure the package is already in the index is a good idea. |
3 participants
I've been noticing a fair number of Hackage packages lacking
documentation due to apparently transient issues (e.g. somehow a package
entering the build queue despite having no entry in the package index,
see #543).
Here we add a simple retry policy; attempting to build a failing package
up to a given number of attempts. The number of failures is now
persisted in the failure file.