Enable RUF013 to enforce optional typing

[cyyever]

What does this PR do?

This PR adds Optional to remaining types and add RUF013 rule to enforce that.

RUFF rule RUF013 checks for the use of implicit Optional in type annotations when the default parameter value is None.

[github-actions]

Hi 👋, thank you for opening this pull request! The pull request is converted to draft by default. The CI will be paused while the PR is in draft mode. When it is ready for review, please click the Ready for review button (at the bottom of the PR page). This will assign reviewers and trigger CI.

[Rocketknight1]

LGTM! One issue, though: We generally don't enforce type hinting. I understand that this will only enforce Optional where there is already a type hint and the default value is None, which makes a lot of sense, but I still want to check with the core maintainers @ArthurZucker and @Cyrilvallez that they're okay with a type hint style check like this!

[cyyever]

@Rocketknight1 And only when we write incomplete types that can default to None. If we don't write types for new code, the check doesn't force us to type them.

[cyyever]

@ArthurZucker This is useful for accurate typing.

[Rocketknight1]

@cyyever can you check the failing files in check_code_quality? There may be a version mismatch or something that's causing your ruff formatting to differ from our CI's

[cyyever]

@Rocketknight1 Because of other packages, ruff was downgraded to 0.9 on my host..

[HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev]

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

[Rocketknight1]

No probs @cyyever, it looks good now! cc @ArthurZucker @Cyrilvallez - let me know if you're okay with adding an extra Ruff rule here to enforce Optional or | None where there is already a type hint and the default value is None.

[ArthurZucker]

Sure! Thanks for the contrib