Skip to content

[vllm compat] Separate renaming from conversion ops - #43621

Merged
Cyrilvallez merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
separate-renaming-converting
Jan 30, 2026
Merged

Cyrilvallez merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
separate-renaming-converting

Conversation

@Cyrilvallez

@Cyrilvallez Cyrilvallez commented Jan 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What does this PR do?

As per the title. Following specs described by @hmellor for vllm compatibility, no logic change should be required. Only the following small changes to mappings should be enough

@Cyrilvallez Cyrilvallez changed the title Separate renaming converting [vllm compat] Separate renaming from conversion ops Jan 30, 2026
@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

@hmellor hmellor added the for patch Tag issues / labels that should be included in the next patch label Jan 30, 2026

@ArthurZucker ArthurZucker left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't mind, but its not always super convenient when you have a lot of renaming

@Cyrilvallez
Cyrilvallez merged commit de4958e into main Jan 30, 2026
24 of 26 checks passed
@Cyrilvallez
Cyrilvallez deleted the separate-renaming-converting branch January 30, 2026 15:37
@hmellor

hmellor commented Jan 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

but its not always super convenient when you have a lot of renaming

Some day I plan to support WeightConverter as well as WeightRenaming in vLLM so this won't be a problem. But for now I only have a WIP for WeightRenaming

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

for patch Tag issues / labels that should be included in the next patch

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants