Support cloid in bulk_modify #112
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This is a breaking change to the bulk_modify API because it changes the input type for
oidfromu64toOidOrCloid.I do think there needs to be a bulk_modify fn that supports bulk_modify with oid and/or cloid because the API supports it. An alternative to this approach that doesn't cause breaking changes is to keep the old bulk_modify and add a new bulk_modify_with_cloid that supports cloid and oid. Up to the team to decide, but I think this breaking change probably minimizes the amount of relic code in the SDK
Test Plan
I just tested this locally in my own setup