Skip to content

Conversation

@courtneypacheco
Copy link
Contributor

@courtneypacheco courtneypacheco commented May 1, 2025

Overview

We don't need to cap these dependencies at this time. If we do, we should cap them in a constraints-dev.txt file like we do in the core repo, but we don't actually need a constraints file if we're not testing upstream.

We don't need to cap these dependencies at this time.

Signed-off-by: Courtney Pacheco <[email protected]>
@mergify mergify bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label May 1, 2025
@mergify mergify bot added the one-approval label May 1, 2025
@ktdreyer
Copy link
Contributor

ktdreyer commented May 1, 2025

Are we running this through e2e?

@courtneypacheco
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ktdreyer We don't have any E2E tests that validate training against AMD ROCm accelerators.

@booxter
Copy link
Contributor

booxter commented May 1, 2025

There are no tests for ROCm upstream. We don't have hardware (atm).

@mergify mergify bot merged commit d690101 into main May 1, 2025
9 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the remove-amd-rocm-cap branch May 1, 2025 14:28
@mergify mergify bot removed the one-approval label May 1, 2025
@courtneypacheco
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mergify backport release-v0.10

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented May 1, 2025

backport release-v0.10

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
deps: Remove caps on ROCm dependencies (backport #517)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants