Skip to content

[BuildBot] Uplift GPU RT version for Linux CI Process #2716

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

bb-sycl
Copy link
Contributor

@bb-sycl bb-sycl commented Nov 2, 2020

Uplift GPU RT version for Linux to 20.43.18277

@DoyleLi
Copy link
Contributor

DoyleLi commented Nov 2, 2020

/summary:run

@yanfeng3721
Copy link
Contributor

yanfeng3721 commented Nov 2, 2020

The test select_device.cpp need to be updated due to the following change:
SYCL_DEVICE_ALLOWLIST=DeviceName:{{Intel\(R\) Graphics Gen9 \[0x3e92\]}},DriverVersion:{{1.0.18277}}
Compared with:
SYCL_DEVICE_ALLOWLIST=DeviceName:{{Intel\(R\) Graphics Gen9 [0x3e98]}},DriverVersion:{{20.42.18209}}

@yanfeng3721
Copy link
Contributor

The test select_device.cpp need to be updated due to the following change:
SYCL_DEVICE_ALLOWLIST=DeviceName:{{Intel\(R\) Graphics Gen9 \[0x3e92\]}},DriverVersion:{{1.0.18277}}
Compared with:
SYCL_DEVICE_ALLOWLIST=DeviceName:{{Intel\(R\) Graphics Gen9 [0x3e98]}},DriverVersion:{{20.42.18209}}

Not test issue, the LIT failure could be fixed by #2719

@bader bader merged commit fb34adc into intel:sycl Nov 9, 2020
jsji pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2024
…kend target (#2716)

This adds a new command line option "spirv-use-llvm-backend-target" that is to translate LLVM IR to SPIR-V using the LLVM SPIRV Backend target. cmake definitions are modified to search for the LLVM SPIRV Backend target while configuring the project, and when LLVM is built with SPIRV Backend support, we may use the interface exposed by SPIRV BE to translate Module to SPIR-V code, but only if a user explicitly asks for this way of LLVM IR transformation.

Original commit:
KhronosGroup/SPIRV-LLVM-Translator@dfeb22b8696d2f5
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants