Support for mutual TLS

[AustinC]

Is there a way to communicate with a docker engine that requires mutual TLS connections?
Thanks for your efforts on this library.

[lispyclouds]

Thanks! It should be possible as mentioned in https://github.com/into-docker/unixsocket-http#tls but I need to write the HTTPS protocol support into clj-docker-client first. I have some other issues to push in the coming days and will take this into account too! 😄

[lispyclouds]

@AustinC I have implemented the first version of support for mTLS. It turned out to be much more complex than I anticipated 🙁
Could you have a look before I can be sure of it and make a release? Here are the steps to follow:

• Clone this repo
• Make a change in the version to 1.0.3
• Build and install locally lein install
• Have docker ready at lets say https://localhost:8000
• Fetch the private key, cert and the CA file from docker, I was using docker-in-docker to test and they are in /certs/client/ca.pem(CA) /certs/client/key.pem(private key) and /certs/client/cert.pem(cert)
• Generate a pkcs12 cert from the private key and cert, using openssl: openssl pkcs12 -export -inkey key.pem -in cert.pem -out mtls.p12. Hit enter 2x for not setting a password.
• Fire up a clojure REPL with lispyclouds/clj-docker-client 1.0.3 loaded
• Make a client like in the docs but with :mtls options like:

  (def http-tls-ping
    (client {:category :_ping
             :conn     {:uri  "https://localhost:8000"
                        :mtls {:ca       "ca.pem"
                               :key      "mtls.p12"
                               :password ""}}}))

• Invoke the ping, this should return "OK"

  (invoke http-tls-ping {:op :SystemPing})

• Try out other stuff if those things works too?

Any feedback here would be really helpful for me specially around your user experience and if you have better ideas please do share! This seems to be weirdly complex.

[lispyclouds]

@xsc Do you have some better ideas for this implementation? Would be really helpful if you do! 😄

[xsc]

@lispyclouds At the very least we should not require users to convert between key formats, I think. :)

I've previously (5 years ago!) written a pem-reader which I now pulled into the into-docker organization (release is still pending, though). The caveat with that one would be that it does not yet support passphrases. :/

But there are other libraries we could have a look at, e.g. pem-keystore. Most of the ones I've seen pull in BouncyCastle, which is a comparatively large dependency.

(And generally, once stable, we might want to consider extracting the :builder-fn creation functionality into a tiny utility library, since that would allow us to use it in other contexts.)

[xsc]

Using pem-reader and okhttp-tls for mTLS/TLS to use the files produced by docker:dind: into-docker/unixsocket-http#7

[lispyclouds]

@xsc This is awesome! I definitely think this is better and we should work with the pems produced by docker. I could not get a good way of loading those pems with java/clj given my limited knowledge on these formats 🙁 Also since this is kinda docker specific, would it make sense to implement this as part of this rather than unixsocket-http?

[xsc]

@lispyclouds I'd not have it in unixsocket-http, which is why I was thinking of maybe making it a tiny utility library. However, I'd be perfectly fine with battle-testing it in clj-docker-client, and if there ever is a big wave of requests to make it standalone, let's do it. 😄

Ah, and don't forget the caveat about passphrases not being supported - that could be a problem.

[lispyclouds]

@xsc I too am thinking of using the pem-reader as a dep in clj-docker-client and yes let it rip for a while. And do the lib pulling and maybe the password support when needed. I pull in the code you wrote as an example with the pem-reader dep. Would you make it 1.0.0? Or should we go ahead with the SNAPSHOT release?

I guess expecting a non password protected key is less intrusive than a whole different format 😄

[xsc]

Let me make some last adjustments tonight, then I'll release 1.0.0.

[lispyclouds]

Awesome! I'll get the code ready in the meantime.