Skip to content

[CONTENT REQUEST] c-ipfs implementation #1287

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
ftyers opened this issue Sep 22, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1554
Closed

[CONTENT REQUEST] c-ipfs implementation #1287

ftyers opened this issue Sep 22, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1554
Assignees
Labels
dif/trivial Can be confidently tackled by newcomers P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up

Comments

@ftyers
Copy link

ftyers commented Sep 22, 2022

Could you add https://git.agorise.net/agorise/c-ipfs to the list of implementations?

@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Sep 22, 2022

Thank you for submitting your first issue to this repository! A maintainer will be here shortly to triage and review.
In the meantime, please double-check that you have provided all the necessary information to make this process easy! Any information that can help save additiona round trips is useful! We currently aim to give initial feedback within two business days. If this does not happen, feel free to leave a comment.
Please keep an eye on how this issue will be labeled, as labels give an overview of priorities, assignments and additional actions requested by the maintainers:

  • "Priority" labels will show how urgent this is for the team.
  • "Status" labels will show if this is ready to be worked on, blocked, or in progress.
  • "Need" labels will indicate if additional input or analysis is required.

Finally, remember to use https://discuss.ipfs.tech if you just need general support.

@guseggert guseggert added the P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up label Oct 6, 2022
@johnnymatthews
Copy link
Contributor

This project hasn't been worked on in 3 years. Is there another fork/git repo under active maintenance?

@ElPaisano ElPaisano assigned ElPaisano and unassigned johnnymatthews Dec 8, 2022
@TMoMoreau
Copy link
Contributor

Relevant issue: #1360

Plan is to split the implementations page into 2 sections. Legacy/deprecated and actively maintained implementations.

@ElPaisano ElPaisano added the dif/trivial Can be confidently tackled by newcomers label Apr 4, 2023
@ElPaisano ElPaisano moved this to 👾 Up next in Protocol Docs Apr 4, 2023
@ElPaisano ElPaisano moved this from 👾 Up next to 🏗 In Progress in Protocol Docs Apr 6, 2023
@ElPaisano
Copy link
Contributor

Echoing Johnny's comment here:

Looks like c-ipfs no longer maintained. So, Ill add this to https://docs.ipfs.tech/concepts/ipfs-implementations/#inactive. If this is incorrect, please comment on the linked PR

PR #1554 (comment)

@ElPaisano ElPaisano moved this from 🏗 In Progress to 👀 In review in Protocol Docs Apr 6, 2023
@ElPaisano ElPaisano linked a pull request Apr 7, 2023 that will close this issue
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Done in Protocol Docs Apr 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dif/trivial Can be confidently tackled by newcomers P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants