Skip to content

Reorg implementations page into 2 separate lists #1360

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
TMoMoreau opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1456
Closed

Reorg implementations page into 2 separate lists #1360

TMoMoreau opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1456
Assignees
@TMoMoreau
Labels
dif/medium Prior experience is likely helpful kind/suggestion Something that you'd like to see in the docs. This can be written content, web design, or imagery. P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up
Milestone
1/27/23 - 2/3/23

Comments

@TMoMoreau
Copy link
Contributor

Plan is to reorg the implementations page into two separate lists, one list at the top for actively maintained implementations, and another list below that to act as a sort of "grab bag" of legacy or deprecated implementations. Currently, all of the implementations are listed together.

https://docs.ipfs.tech/basics/ipfs-implementations/
@TMoMoreau TMoMoreau added P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up dif/medium Prior experience is likely helpful kind/suggestion Something that you'd like to see in the docs. This can be written content, web design, or imagery. labels Dec 9, 2022
@TMoMoreau TMoMoreau self-assigned this Dec 9, 2022
@salmad3 salmad3 mentioned this issue Dec 12, 2022
Closed
@TMoMoreau TMoMoreau mentioned this issue Dec 13, 2022
Closed
@ElPaisano ElPaisano added P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up and removed P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up labels Dec 13, 2022
@ipfs ipfs deleted a comment from welcome bot Dec 13, 2022
This was referenced Jan 25, 2023
Closed
Closed
@TMoMoreau
Copy link
Contributor Author

What are we considering "active" when it comes to these implementations?

@2color would you consider Auspinner still "active"?

@2color
Copy link
Member

2color commented Jan 26, 2023

I wouldn't really consider it active. But it still works.

I think maybe setting the criteria of activity in the last 6 months might be a good bar for this

@ElPaisano
Copy link
Contributor

@TMoMoreau can you link the PR for this?

@TMoMoreau
Copy link
Contributor Author

No PR yet, will link it when it's up. PR will be up shortly.

@TMoMoreau TMoMoreau mentioned this issue Jan 26, 2023
Merged
3 tasks
@TMoMoreau TMoMoreau linked a pull request Jan 26, 2023 that will close this issue
Separating implementations list into 2 #1456
Merged
3 tasks
@TMoMoreau
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ElPaisano PR #1456

@2color 2color mentioned this issue Feb 1, 2023
Merged
2 tasks
@2color 2color added this to the 1/27/23 - 2/3/23 milestone Feb 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@TMoMoreau TMoMoreau

Labels
dif/medium Prior experience is likely helpful kind/suggestion Something that you'd like to see in the docs. This can be written content, web design, or imagery. P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1/27/23 - 2/3/23
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Separating implementations list into 2 ipfs/ipfs-docs
3 participants
@2color @TMoMoreau @ElPaisano