Add readonly api to gateway #1581
Conversation
|
cc @harlantwood as he'll be interested to follow this |
|
The remaining todo here is to write test cases. Suggestions? |
|
Great to see this moving! We're doing interesting work on the graph visualization side... Will share more soon. |
rht
force-pushed
the
feat/read-only-api-gateway
branch
from
5823cde to
3357d2f
Compare
|
@jbenet are the test cases adequate? If so, RFM. Otherwise testing all the API commands might be redundant. |
Based on ipfs#1389 License: MIT Signed-off-by: rht <[email protected]>
rht
force-pushed
the
feat/read-only-api-gateway
branch
from
3357d2f to
dd99a70
Compare
|
@rht looks great to me! so simple :) 👍 |
|
@harlantwood @krl read only api is in! 👍 thanks @rht |
|
Awesome thanks @rht! |
|
@jbenet I'm interested to know when this is released to the public gateway. Is there a way we track what is released there? Otherwise maybe comment here when it's live. |
|
@lgierth could you deploy to public gateways? — On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Harlan T Wood [email protected]
|
|
👍 |
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| "cat": CatCmd, | ||
| "commands": CommandsDaemonCmd, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wait, one more small fix: this lists the Root commands instead of RootRO.
|
API is sanitized here #1583 |
Based on #1389
(wip)