docs(security): document OpenSSF hard evidence#8585
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jonah Kowall <jkowall@kowall.net>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates Jaeger’s security documentation to provide durable “hard evidence” links and rationale needed for the OpenSSF Best Practices Gold badge follow-ups (tracked in #8484 / #8481), focusing on reproducible builds, coverage, site hardening, and dynamic analysis.
Changes:
- Adds a new “Hard-Evidence Criteria” section with maintained links to CI workflows, Makefile targets, and supporting docs for Gold evidence items.
- Records current rationale/plan for branch coverage (potential N/A) and website security-header constraints/actions.
- Updates the “Last reviewed” date and narrows the remaining work item for #8484 to the unresolved badge-app follow-ups.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Signed-off-by: Jonah Kowall <jkowall@kowall.net> # Conflicts: # docs/security/openssf-gold-evidence.md
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8585 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 96.59% 96.56% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 331 331
Lines 17566 17566
==========================================
- Hits 16967 16963 -4
- Misses 451 454 +3
- Partials 148 149 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
CI Summary ReportMetrics Comparison❌ 36 metric change(s) detected View changed metricsFor label-level diff details, open the CI run and expand the "Compare metrics and generate summary" step logs. metrics_snapshot_elasticsearch_9.x_e2e — ⬇️ download diff
Code Coverage✅ Coverage 97.3% (baseline 97.3%) ➡️ View CI run | View publish logs |
Summary
Refs #8484
Refs #8481
Testing