Should there be a generic marker, not connected by mnemonic to any particular territory or currency? The natural model for it could be ¤, which is the generic currency sign. The marker might resemble

<svg
width='12' height='12'
viewBox='-349 -349 698 698'
id='Generic'
xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'
>
<path fill='#333' d='
M 279 349 L 349 279 L -279 -349 L -349 -279 Z
M -279 349 L -349 279 L 279 -349 L 349 -279 Z
'/>
<circle fill='#333' r='297'/>
<circle fill='#CCC' r='198'/>
<circle fill='#333' r='99'/>
</svg>
(Observe that √2 ≈ 99⁄70, to within ±1 part in 19601.)
There could be multiple variations of it, with greys as dark,light:
- 000, FFF
- 333, FFF
- 666, FFF
- 000, CCC
- 333, CCC
- 666, CCC
- 000, 999
- 333, 999
Naming? XXX0F, XXX3F, XXX6F, XXX0C, XXX3C, XXX6C, XXX09, XXX39? But I am not convinced that it is type-safe to have the colours in the name. Comment would be welcomed.
Maybe the inner greys should actually be vibrant colours, to better distinguish the generics. If so, that would affect naming. Again, comment would be welcomed.
Should there be a generic marker, not connected by mnemonic to any particular territory or currency? The natural model for it could be ¤, which is the generic currency sign. The marker might resemble
(Observe that √2 ≈ 99⁄70, to within ±1 part in 19601.)
There could be multiple variations of it, with greys as dark,light:
Naming? XXX0F, XXX3F, XXX6F, XXX0C, XXX3C, XXX6C, XXX09, XXX39? But I am not convinced that it is type-safe to have the colours in the name. Comment would be welcomed.
Maybe the inner greys should actually be vibrant colours, to better distinguish the generics. If so, that would affect naming. Again, comment would be welcomed.