It only occurs when the html links to images without extension. For example, if an html file contains a link to image.jpg everything works fine. If it contains a link to the same file renamed image, LibreOffice complains when I open the document, stating that it is corrupt and LibreOffice can try to "repair" it. The repair is always successful and the document opens.
The only difference between the two resulting files: the second ODT file has no entry for the image in the manifest.xml whereas the first one contains:
<manifest:file-entry manifest:media-type="image/jpeg" manifest:full-path="Pictures/0.jpg" manifest:version="1.2" />
Why does it matter? (I could name my files better)
The thing is that I only discovered this using base64 encoded images embedded in HTML. And these have no filename since the source IS the file…
System: Ubuntu 14.04
Pandoc version: 1.12.2.1
LibreOffice version: 4.2.6.3
It only occurs when the html links to images without extension. For example, if an html file contains a link to
image.jpgeverything works fine. If it contains a link to the same file renamedimage, LibreOffice complains when I open the document, stating that it is corrupt and LibreOffice can try to "repair" it. The repair is always successful and the document opens.The only difference between the two resulting files: the second ODT file has no entry for the image in the
manifest.xmlwhereas the first one contains:Why does it matter? (I could name my files better)
The thing is that I only discovered this using base64 encoded images embedded in HTML. And these have no filename since the source IS the file…
System: Ubuntu 14.04
Pandoc version: 1.12.2.1
LibreOffice version: 4.2.6.3