Skip to content

Remove react/prop-types from the recommended config #3753

Open

Description

@Arkellys

React 19 will remove propTypes validation for function:

In React 19, we’re removing the propType checks from the React package, and using them will be silently ignored. If you’re using propTypes, we recommend migrating to TypeScript or another type-checking solution.

I suppose it can wait for v19 official release, but given this change I think the rule react/prop-types should be removed from the recommended configuration.

Activity

  1. ljharb commented on May 11, 2024

    @ljharb
    Member

    It shouldn’t be removed ever - it also enforces TS types.

    However, it shouldn’t allow or suggest/push runtime propTypes if the react version is 19+.

  2. Jimbolino commented on Jun 24, 2024

    @Jimbolino

    Today I started adding propTypes to all my components after running eslint for the first time on a new react project.

    maybe the rule can be disabled automagically if:

    • react 15 or newer
    • typescript=false
  3. ljharb commented on Jun 24, 2024

    @ljharb
    Member

    non-TS propTypes work fine in react 15, 16, 17, and 18, so that wouldn't make sense.

  4. Jimbolino commented on Jun 25, 2024

    @Jimbolino

    on the official react blogpost they literaly say:

    PropTypes were deprecated in April 2017 (v15.5.0).

    i dont think deprecated functionality should be in the recommended ruleset. Since it encourages users to add depricated functionality to their project. (even though it still works, and will be silently ignored in the next version of react)

  5. ljharb commented on Jun 25, 2024

    @ljharb
    Member

    Something that adds a lot of value, such that it’s been 7 years and it’s still not removed, is worth recommending. “the project team says it’s icky” isn’t a good reason not to do so.

  6. Jimbolino commented on Jun 25, 2024

    @Jimbolino

    also for people that are not using typescript?
    i really dont understand why you would recommend users to add proptypes in react 18, if they will be removed in react 19?

  7. zettca commented on Jun 25, 2024

    @zettca

    such that it’s been 7 years and it’s still not removed

    The React team takes backwards-compatibility seriously. Not removing it right away (in the next major) doesn't make it "less deprecated".

    is worth recommending. “the project team says it’s icky” isn’t a good reason not to do so.

    I'm really confused. The "react" ESLint plugin is actively recommending the usage of deprecated APIs?
    New projects will be recommended to add extra code that has been deprecated and recommended against by the React team for years now.

    I can definitely understand this rule existing for teams to opt-in. But as a recommended configuration... I can't see how this isn't actively working against React's evolution and progress.

    Is this up for debate? Or isn't it worth it because you disagree with it @ljharb? I really can't think of a better reason that recommended deprecated/removed APIs

  8. ljharb commented on Jun 25, 2024

    @ljharb
    Member

    @zettca the rule checks for more than just propTypes. The propTypes checks should be always automatically disabled in react 19+. I'm perfectly content to add an option that allows you to opt out of these checks in an earlier react version, if you're using a react that supports propTypes and don't wish to benefit from them.

    As for the recommended config, it predates me and I don't suggest people use it. The thing I recommend people do is use this plugin via the airbnb config.

    If I ever do a semver major, the recommended config is going to either be removed entirely, or, just match the airbnb config's react config.

  9. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions