Skip to content

add discussion of interpreting statuses and results #32

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 15, 2017
Merged

Conversation

mlubin
Copy link
Member

@mlubin mlubin commented Jul 14, 2017

I believe this discussion encapsulates the conclusions of JuliaOpt/MathProgBase.jl#164 and discussions at the meetup.

@mlubin
Copy link
Member Author

mlubin commented Jul 15, 2017

CC @ccoffrin @blegat

@blegat
Copy link
Member

blegat commented Jul 15, 2017

We might add for the primal-dual class that when a infeasibility ray is found, if one desire to know whether the problem is unbounded he often needs to set the objective to zero and resolve. Only the combination of a feasible point and a infeasibility ray makes an unbounded ray, certificate of unboundedness.

@mlubin mlubin merged commit 407c416 into master Jul 15, 2017
@mlubin mlubin deleted the ml/statuses branch July 15, 2017 13:17
@IssamT IssamT mentioned this pull request Nov 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants