Open
Conversation
krassowski
reviewed
Mar 2, 2026
krassowski
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2026
Member
krassowski
left a comment
krassowski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tiny suggestion on simplifying subcommand descriptions
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #42
Description
Removed the commented-out commands that are not intended to be implemented here. These commands will remain in JupyterLab and continue to run via the
jupyter labextensioncommand as they currently do.(Should any of them instead be implemented in this package ?)
Updated command names to align with the builder conventions and added relevant examples.
Regarding version restoration: Is it necessary here? If yes I think we could use the package version.