Emit events for collaborative sessions#139
Conversation
|
|
Codecov ReportPatch and project coverage have no change.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #139 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 0.00% 0.00%
=====================================
Files 7 7
Lines 408 452 +44
=====================================
- Misses 408 452 +44
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
| else: | ||
| self._emit( | ||
| "initialize", | ||
| "There is another collaborative session accessing the same file.\nThe synchronization between rooms is not supported and you might lose some of your progress.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From here, I thought synchronization between rooms was supported. Could you clarify?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess we should rather say that it is experimental.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The UX of synchronization between rooms is pretty bad. With a good connection, a noticeable delay makes it unpredictable.
When two users are editing the same file using different models (for example, a user editing a notebook using the notebook view and another one using the plain text editor), propagating the changes from user A in room A to user B in room B takes a few seconds (there is a 1s delay to save the document + 1s delay for polling the file assuming that the communication and load delay is 0). During those 2s, user B can write a sentence that will disappear without any notification or asking the user if they want to overwrite the content.
In addition, we use the default content manager to load and save documents. When loading or saving a notebook, the content manager throws an error if the notebook is invalid (so it doesn't load/save the content). If user A in room A is editing the notebook using the plain text view, room B (with user B using the notebook editor) will be updated only when room A saves a valid notebook. Suppose user A forgets a curly bracket (which often happens because there is no visual indicator). In that case, everything user B is typing will be deleted once user A fixes the notebook without allowing user B to overwrite what is on the disk. Furthermore, if user B doesn't realize that their changes are not being saved, they can be typing for hours, and everything will be deleted.
The combination of auto-saving and room synchronization can be catastrophic; in my opinion, we can not call that "supported".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fair enough, I agree that synchronization happening "through the file system" is not ideal, but we need to have at least a way to propagate changes between views. Otherwise, if the frontend reacts to file changes made in the backend, and you have one user with a notebook opened as a notebook document, and another user with the same notebook opened as a JSON document, what is the behavior?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Otherwise, if the frontend reacts to file changes made in the backend, and you have one user with a notebook opened as a notebook document, and another user with the same notebook opened as a JSON document, what is the behavior?
Yes, that's why I'm not removing the sync between rooms. Instead, I notify users saying that it is dangerous to use it.
Ideally, a secondary communication channel would be created to allow users to intervene in those decisions. I'm on it as well.
fcollonval
left a comment
fcollonval
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks a lot @hbcarlos this is a great addition.
I have minor wording comments and two suggestions:
- Use an enum for the level of message
- Use the JupyterLab logger instead of the browser console
Co-authored-by: Afshin Taylor Darian <git@darian.email>
Co-authored-by: Afshin Taylor Darian <git@darian.email>
Co-authored-by: Afshin Taylor Darian <git@darian.email>
fcollonval
left a comment
fcollonval
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @hbcarlos
Some final minor suggestions from me and it should be ready.
|
cf. (for linking or if others are interested) the JEP for publishing versioned schema files: jupyter/enhancement-proposals#108 |
5 participants
Emits events during a collaborative session.
Adds a new lab plugin to log the events in the dev console of the client. This might be useful to debug issues from users that don't have access to the terminal where the server is running, for example, users of JupyterHub-based deployments.
Adds a new dialog to alert users that multiple rooms are accessing the same file.