-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Add Verifiers to TxDetail #56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
emmanueldenloye
wants to merge
5
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
emmanuel/add-verifiers
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b7eb7ff
Add Verifiers to TxDetail
giantimi eb50a6b
Add Verifier datatype;move SigCapability to separate module
giantimi 2520b2b
update TxDetail datatype
giantimi eb57e84
fix TxDetail module compilation error
giantimi fc84dce
make verifier proof field JSON for simplicity
giantimi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can do better than this. These verifiers are conceptually similar to signers, so we probably need a
Verifier
data type and a database table to go with it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While we could indeed consider adding verifiers as a new column to the
transactions
table, I think there's good reason to keep it in a separate table like thesigners
table, because there can be multiple verifiers in a given transaction and if one wanted to index by, say, the verifier name, that would be impossible to do via thetransactions
table.