koord-scheduler: compatible with lightweight-coscheduling#1007
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
|
cc @tzzcfrank |
Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
12e4cc2 to
2e9f227
Compare
Codecov ReportBase: 67.52% // Head: 67.51% // Decreases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1007 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 67.52% 67.51% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 249 249
Lines 28174 28177 +3
==========================================
- Hits 19025 19024 -1
- Misses 7844 7852 +8
+ Partials 1305 1301 -4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: FillZpp, hormes The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Joseph joseph.t.lee@outlook.com
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
Some users are still using lightweight-coscheduling, so require the coscheduling plugin to be compatible with lightweight-coscheduling. PodGroups are not created when the Pod uses the lightweight-coscheduling API.
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it
Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews
V. Checklist
make test