Skip to content

🐛Fix behavior of rate limit option in priorityqueue.AddWithOpts #3103

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2025

Conversation

zach593
Copy link
Contributor

@zach593 zach593 commented Feb 6, 2025

func (w *priorityqueue[T]) AddWithOpts(o AddOpts, items ...T) {
w.lock.Lock()
defer w.lock.Unlock()
for _, key := range items {
if o.RateLimited {
after := w.rateLimiter.When(key)
if o.After == 0 || after < o.After {
o.After = after
}
}
var readyAt *time.Time
if o.After > 0 {
readyAt = ptr.To(w.now().Add(o.After))
w.metrics.retry()
}

Since priorityqueue.AddWithOpts() allows adding multiple items, if o.RateLimited is true, the o.After value could get overwritten in the loop and affect subsequent items.

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Feb 6, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: zach593 / name: Zach (ba53477)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @zach593. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 6, 2025
@zach593 zach593 force-pushed the fix-AddWithOpts branch 5 times, most recently from 1c4fdff to 102df33 Compare February 6, 2025 16:23
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 6, 2025
@alvaroaleman
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 8, 2025
@alvaroaleman
Copy link
Member

/cherrypick release-0.20

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@alvaroaleman: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-0.20 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-0.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Member

@alvaroaleman alvaroaleman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great catch, thanks for that and sending the fix!

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman, zach593

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: c797a95efef6c9d54f182307413849d0217fb33d

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c5bb1d4 into kubernetes-sigs:main Feb 8, 2025
11 checks passed
@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@alvaroaleman: new pull request created: #3106

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-0.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants