Skip to content

plugins: Add signature field for future plugin verification #3337 #3509

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shiavm006
Copy link

Add optional signatureInfo field to plugin metadata interface to support future plugin signature verification for enhanced security.
issue fixed #3337
#Changes-

  • Added signatureInfo?: string to ArtifactHubHeadlampPkg interface
  • Extract signature data from ArtifactHub metadata when available
  • Updated documentation to clarify current security measures

Ready for review.

Add signatureInfo field to ArtifactHubHeadlampPkg interface to support
plugin signature verification. This enables future security enhancements
while maintaining backward compatibility with existing plugins.

- Added optional signatureInfo field to plugin metadata extraction
- Updated documentation to clarify current security measures
- Minimal changes to preserve existing functionality
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jun 23, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from illume June 23, 2025 16:03
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: shiavm006
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sniok for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from vyncent-t June 23, 2025 16:03
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @shiavm006!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/headlamp 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/headlamp has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 23, 2025
@shiavm006
Copy link
Author

@illume can u look into this pr

@shiavm006
Copy link
Author

@mortent @vyncent-t can u look into this pr

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support/verify plugins' signatures
2 participants