Add conformance tests for same priority disjoint CNPs

[TheBeeZee]

Adds a conformance test case to verify that the implementation correctly applies multiple ClusterNetworkPolicies in the Admin tier sharing the same priority but targeting different subjects (disjoint).

• Policies: Two CNPs with priority 15 targeting gryffindor and hufflepuff respectively.
• Assertions: Verifies that allowed traffic for both policies succeeds, and unmatched traffic is correctly blocked by their respective deny rules.

Fixes: #223

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-network-policy-api ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	ca0e307
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-sigs-network-policy-api/deploys/6a331b84412874000926061f
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-385--kubernetes-sigs-network-policy-api.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @TheBeeZee. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[danwinship]

/ok-to-test
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship, TheBeeZee

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [danwinship]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[npinaeva]

Hey @TheBeeZee! This issue #223 is assigned to @vpbh did you sync with him?
We also have discussed desired test cases #223 (comment) but yours have both different subjects and different peers

[vpbh]

Thanks @npinaeva , Blaž beat me to the PR. :) He can continue working on this one. I have started working on issue #103, and have generated this PR for the issue: #386