Skip to content

KEP-3636 CSI Drivers in Windows as HostProcess Pods #3641

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

KEP-3636 CSI Drivers in Windows as HostProcess Pods #3641

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member

@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe commented Oct 28, 2022 •
edited
Loading

  • One-line PR description: Adding new Kep

/cc @msau42 @ddebroy @jingxu97

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory sig/windows Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Windows. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 28, 2022
@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe force-pushed the csi-proxy-host-process-container branch 2 times, most recently from edbe2bc to 8cfda48 Compare October 28, 2022 04:41
@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe changed the title KEP-3636 CSI Drivers in Windows as a HostProcess Pods KEP-3636 CSI Drivers in Windows as HostProcess Pods Oct 28, 2022
@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe force-pushed the csi-proxy-host-process-container branch 3 times, most recently from ddd8336 to 7eeaac8 Compare October 28, 2022 04:51
@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

/sig storage

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. label Oct 28, 2022
@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2022
Closed
7 tasks
@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @jingxu97

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from jingxu97 October 28, 2022 15:28
@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe force-pushed the csi-proxy-host-process-container branch from 7eeaac8 to 53b68cf Compare October 28, 2022 15:30
@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2022
Closed
@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe force-pushed the csi-proxy-host-process-container branch from 53b68cf to 5d34ce0 Compare October 31, 2022 15:51
@jsturtevant
Copy link
Contributor

/cc @marosset @brasmith-ms

ameade
ameade reviewed Nov 1, 2022
View reviewed changes
ameade
ameade reviewed Nov 1, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@ameade ameade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @mauriciopoppe, was nice meeting you briefly at KubeCon. Just some minor comments.

From the code PR, "The named pipes are not protected, this means that not only CSI Drivers but any Windows workload can mount them and execute privileged storage operations (imagine a workload reformatting the volume of another workload ). This is a current problem as of now." I think this is the case for any Pod that mounts a hostPath, windows or otherwise. I guess filesystem permissions help here?

We should mention that hostProcess support is going stable in k8s 1.26 and requires containerd 1.7 (unreleased) as mentioned in the SIG Windows update at KubeCon.

Maybe mention for those that will need to make the conversion about the new small host process base image. bit.ly/hpc-base-image

@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2022
Merged
jsturtevant
jsturtevant reviewed Nov 23, 2022
View reviewed changes
@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

@ameade

From the code PR, "The named pipes are not protected, this means that not only CSI Drivers but any Windows workload can mount them and execute privileged storage operations (imagine a workload reformatting the volume of another workload ). This is a current problem as of now." I think this is the case for any Pod that mounts a hostPath, windows or otherwise. I guess filesystem permissions help here?

You're right on it being a problem in Linux too, I've updated the security part so that there's a suggested workflow for Cluster Administrators to determine the workload privileges per namespace using Pod Security Standards.

We should mention that hostProcess support is going stable in k8s 1.26 and requires containerd 1.7 (unreleased) as mentioned in the SIG Windows update at KubeCon.
Maybe mention for those that will need to make the conversion about the new small host process base image. bit.ly/hpc-base-image

Good points, I'll add them to the doc

msau42
msau42 reviewed Dec 3, 2022
View reviewed changes
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Oct 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mauriciopoppe: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Oct 17, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 15, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 14, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this May 13, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mauriciopoppe: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label May 13, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mauriciopoppe
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign johnbelamaric for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe force-pushed the csi-proxy-host-process-container branch from 3040a1f to 2f9072b Compare May 16, 2025 16:49
@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member Author

Reviving the CSI Proxy v2 effort after 3 years. I updated the graduation criteria and addressed comments.

/cc @torredil @laozc @msau42.

@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe moved this from Done to In Review in [sig-windows] PR tracking May 16, 2025
@mauriciopoppe mauriciopoppe force-pushed the csi-proxy-host-process-container branch from 2f9072b to 83bfe25 Compare May 16, 2025 16:53
torredil
torredil reviewed May 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@torredil torredil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated graduation criteria and latest revision looks good to me.
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jsturtevant jsturtevant jsturtevant left review comments

@ameade ameade ameade left review comments

@ddebroy ddebroy ddebroy left review comments

@msau42 msau42 msau42 left review comments

@torredil torredil torredil left review comments

@jingxu97 jingxu97 Awaiting requested review from jingxu97

@brasmith-ms brasmith-ms Awaiting requested review from brasmith-ms

@marosset marosset Awaiting requested review from marosset

@andyzhangx andyzhangx Awaiting requested review from andyzhangx

Assignees

@torredil torredil

Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. sig/windows Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Windows. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
[sig-windows] PR tracking
Status: In Review
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
9 participants
@mauriciopoppe @jsturtevant @k8s-triage-robot @k8s-ci-robot @msau42 @aravindhp @ameade @ddebroy @torredil