Skip to content

Conversation

altserg
Copy link
Contributor

@altserg altserg commented Jan 9, 2025

Ignore energy report messages for Transaction.Begin context

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced OCPP (Open Charge Point Protocol) data processing for charging sessions.
    • Introduced a new enumeration ReadingContext for improved context handling.
    • Improved handling of transaction meter values by adding context-specific filtering.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved potential data processing issues during transaction start.

@altserg altserg had a problem deploying to continuous-integration January 9, 2025 11:21 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@lbbrhzn
Copy link
Owner

lbbrhzn commented Jan 9, 2025

@altserg can you add a description to this pull request please?

@altserg altserg had a problem deploying to continuous-integration January 9, 2025 12:15 — with GitHub Actions Failure
Now the Active.Import.Register sensor also gets updated
@altserg altserg had a problem deploying to continuous-integration January 12, 2025 21:32 — with GitHub Actions Failure
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new enumeration ReadingContext to the import statements from ocpp.v16.enums and modifies the process_measurands method in the ChargePoint class. The update adds a condition to ignore messages with a Transaction Begin context when processing meter values, refining the handling of incoming data during transactions and ensuring that specific context values do not affect session energy metrics.

Changes

File Change Summary
custom_components/ocpp/chargepoint.py - Added ReadingContext enum import from ocpp.v16.enums
- Modified process_measurands method to skip processing measurands with Transaction Begin context

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant CP as Charge Point
    participant MS as Meter Service
    
    CP->>MS: Receive Meter Values
    alt Transaction Begin Context
        MS-->>CP: Ignore Specific Measurands
    else Normal Context
        MS->>CP: Process Meter Values
    end
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the world of charge and flow,
A rabbit hops where metrics grow.
With a context clear, we skip the start,
Keeping our data, a work of art.
OCPP's dance, so bright and spry,
Charging ahead, we reach for the sky! ⚡✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 87ad713 and 823d6d0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • custom_components/ocpp/chargepoint.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
custom_components/ocpp/chargepoint.py (2)

26-32: Good addition of the ReadingContext enum to imports.

The inclusion of ReadingContext to the imports is appropriate since it's needed for the new transaction begin context check in process_measurands.


635-647:

✅ Verification successful

Appropriate filter for Transaction Begin context messages.

This change properly ignores energy report messages with a Transaction Begin context, which addresses the issue stated in PR #1466. The filter is implemented at the right place in the code flow and maintains the existing indentation and structure.

The code maintains logical flow by using the continue statement to skip processing of these specific messages while allowing other measurands to be processed normally.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the ReadingContext enum has a transaction_begin value
# to verify that this is a valid check

ast-grep --pattern 'ReadingContext.transaction_begin.value'

Length of output: 179


Transaction Begin Filter Verified

The check using ReadingContext.transaction_begin.value at line 636 correctly identifies Transaction Begin context messages. The use of the continue statement to skip processing these energy report messages is properly implemented per PR #1466. The logical flow and code structure remain intact.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
custom_components/ocpp/chargepoint.py (1)

780-792: Consider improving readability.

The nested conditions could be simplified and the comment could be more descriptive. Here's a suggested refactor:

-    # Ignore messages with Transaction Begin context
-    if context != ReadingContext.transaction_begin.value:
-        if is_transaction:
-            self._metrics[csess.session_energy.value].value = value
-            self._metrics[csess.session_energy.value].unit = unit
-            self._metrics[csess.session_energy.value].extra_attr[
-                cstat.id_tag.name
-            ] = self._metrics[cstat.id_tag.value].value
-        else:
-            self._metrics[measurand].value = value
-            self._metrics[measurand].unit = unit
-    else:
-        continue
+    # Skip processing for Transaction Begin context as these values
+    # should not contribute to energy metrics
+    if context == ReadingContext.transaction_begin.value:
+        continue
+
+    if is_transaction:
+        self._metrics[csess.session_energy.value].value = value
+        self._metrics[csess.session_energy.value].unit = unit
+        self._metrics[csess.session_energy.value].extra_attr[
+            cstat.id_tag.name
+        ] = self._metrics[cstat.id_tag.value].value
+    else:
+        self._metrics[measurand].value = value
+        self._metrics[measurand].unit = unit
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88cafb7 and 87ad713.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • custom_components/ocpp/chargepoint.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
custom_components/ocpp/chargepoint.py (2)

31-37: LGTM! Import changes are appropriate.

The addition of ReadingContext enum is necessary for the new functionality and is correctly grouped with other enums from the same module.


780-792: LGTM! Changes correctly address the issue.

The implementation properly ignores energy report messages with Transaction Begin context, which aligns with the PR objective to fix issue #1466.

@lbbrhzn lbbrhzn temporarily deployed to continuous-integration March 1, 2025 22:07 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@lbbrhzn lbbrhzn temporarily deployed to continuous-integration March 1, 2025 22:08 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.75%. Comparing base (52f53ae) to head (6a69690).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1477   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.75%   92.75%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines        2028     2030    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         1881     1883    +2     
  Misses        147      147           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lbbrhzn lbbrhzn merged commit b9d722d into lbbrhzn:main Mar 1, 2025
9 checks passed
@altserg altserg deleted the Fix-1466 branch March 10, 2025 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants