-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
remove extra post_connect calls #1527
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request updates the Docker image in the development container configuration by switching from Python 3.12 to 3.13. Additionally, in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant CP as ChargePoint
participant Delay as Timer
rect rgb(230, 230, 250)
Note over CP: Old Flow
CP->>CP: start() or reconnect() invoked
CP->>CP: Automatically call post_connect()
CP->>CP: Set status (STATE_OK)
CP->>Delay: await asyncio.sleep(2)
Delay-->>CP: Resume execution
end
rect rgb(210, 245, 210)
Note over CP: New Flow
CP->>CP: start() or reconnect() invoked
Note right of CP: post_connect() is not auto-invoked
CP->>CP: Proceeds without delay
end
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.devcontainer.json
(1 hunks)custom_components/ocpp/chargepoint.py
(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .devcontainer.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Run tests
🔇 Additional comments (2)
custom_components/ocpp/chargepoint.py (2)
223-251
: No 2-second delay in post_connect methodThe post_connect method no longer includes a 2-second sleep delay after setting the status to STATE_OK. This change will make operations proceed immediately rather than waiting, which could affect timing-sensitive code.
Removing the sleep improves responsiveness and is generally a good change as long as there are no timing dependencies in the subsequent operations.
430-430
:✅ Verification successful
Removed post_connect call from reconnect method's else branch
Similar to the change in the start method, post_connect is no longer automatically called during reconnection when post_connect_success is False. This creates a consistent behavior between the if/else branches but might lead to issues if post_connect is needed during initial connections.
Make sure this change is intentional and aligns with the overall design. The post_connect method is still called in _register_boot_notification (line 456), but ensure this path is sufficient for all use cases.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check where post_connect is called in the codebase rg -A 1 "post_connect\(\)" --type pyLength of output: 176
Confirm Post_Connect Adjustment in Connection Flow
The removal of the post_connect() call from the reconnect method's else branch appears intentional and aligns with the updated design in the start method. Our search confirms that post_connect is still scheduled via _register_boot_notification (evidenced by the call to
self.hass.async_create_task(self.post_connect())in
custom_components/ocpp/chargepoint.py
), which should cover initial connection scenarios. Please ensure that all edge cases—especially those related to reconnection—are adequately handled by this design.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1527 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.75% 92.75% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 12 12
Lines 2030 2029 -1
==========================================
- Hits 1883 1882 -1
Misses 147 147 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
See #1510 for discussion and testing results of change
Summary by CodeRabbit