Skip to content

[enhancement] Consistent parameter naming #1462

@TNick

Description

@TNick

A network with three maxout.MaxoutLocalC01B, a maxout.Maxout and a mlp.Softmax prints Parameter and initial learning rate summary like so:

    W: 0.0025
    b: 0.0025
    W: 0.0025
    b: 0.0025
    W: 0.0025
    b: 0.0025
    layer_4_W: 0.05
    layer_4_b: 0.05
    softmax_b: 0.05
    softmax_W: 0.05

This is all but consistent. I like the layer.name + '_' + W/b notation.
It is already used in most parts of the library, as grep -R "\.name = " shows.

Would you accept a PR with that? If not, please suggest other naming convention and I would be happy to write a PR.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions