[mlir] free threading support for mlir python bindings #105522
Labels
Comments
jpienaar
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 12, 2025
…07103) Related to #105522 Description: This PR is a joint work with Peter Hawkins (@hawkinsp) originally done by myself for pybind11 and then reworked to nanobind based on Peter's branch: https://github.com/hawkinsp/llvm-project/tree/nbdev . - Added free-threading CPython mode support for MLIR Python bindings - Added a test which can reveal data races when cpython and LLVM/MLIR compiled with TSAN Context: - Related to jax-ml/jax#23073 Co-authored-by: Peter Hawkins <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to arm/arm-toolchain
that referenced
this issue
Jan 12, 2025
…indings (#107103) Related to llvm/llvm-project#105522 Description: This PR is a joint work with Peter Hawkins (@hawkinsp) originally done by myself for pybind11 and then reworked to nanobind based on Peter's branch: https://github.com/hawkinsp/llvm-project/tree/nbdev . - Added free-threading CPython mode support for MLIR Python bindings - Added a test which can reveal data races when cpython and LLVM/MLIR compiled with TSAN Context: - Related to jax-ml/jax#23073 Co-authored-by: Peter Hawkins <[email protected]>
|
Is there more to do here, or can this be closed now that gh-105522 is merged? |
|
Thanks Ralf, let's close this issue as completed. PR closing this issue: #107103 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
I wanted to ask whether there are plans to add free-threading support to MLIR python bindings?
Essentially, we may need to update the extensions this way (link):
I can help with providing a draft PR for that and we can iterate over if there are more updates required.
Thanks!
Context:
We are adding free-threading support to JAX: jax-ml/jax#23073.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: