Reapply "[Flang][OpenMP][Lower] NFC: Move clause processing helpers into the ClauseProcessor (#85258)" #85807
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
llvmbot
added
flang
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-openmp @llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-fir-hlfir Author: Sergio Afonso (skatrak) ChangesThis patch contains slight modifications to the reverted PR #85258 to avoid issues with constructs containing multiple reduction clauses, uncovered by a test on the gfortran testsuite. This reverts commit 9f80444. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85807.diff 5 Files Affected:
diff --git a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/ClauseProcessor.cpp b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/ClauseProcessor.cpp
index 13347c8cf7b658..86aa8f0671c625 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/ClauseProcessor.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/ClauseProcessor.cpp
@@ -208,6 +208,25 @@ addUseDeviceClause(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
useDeviceSymbols.push_back(object.id());
}
+static void convertLoopBounds(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
+ mlir::Location loc,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &lowerBound,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &upperBound,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &step,
+ std::size_t loopVarTypeSize) {
+ fir::FirOpBuilder &firOpBuilder = converter.getFirOpBuilder();
+ // The types of lower bound, upper bound, and step are converted into the
+ // type of the loop variable if necessary.
+ mlir::Type loopVarType = getLoopVarType(converter, loopVarTypeSize);
+ for (unsigned it = 0; it < (unsigned)lowerBound.size(); it++) {
+ lowerBound[it] =
+ firOpBuilder.createConvert(loc, loopVarType, lowerBound[it]);
+ upperBound[it] =
+ firOpBuilder.createConvert(loc, loopVarType, upperBound[it]);
+ step[it] = firOpBuilder.createConvert(loc, loopVarType, step[it]);
+ }
+}
+
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// ClauseProcessor unique clauses
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
@@ -217,8 +236,7 @@ bool ClauseProcessor::processCollapse(
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &lowerBound,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &upperBound,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &step,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> &iv,
- std::size_t &loopVarTypeSize) const {
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> &iv) const {
bool found = false;
fir::FirOpBuilder &firOpBuilder = converter.getFirOpBuilder();
@@ -236,7 +254,7 @@ bool ClauseProcessor::processCollapse(
found = true;
}
- loopVarTypeSize = 0;
+ std::size_t loopVarTypeSize = 0;
do {
Fortran::lower::pft::Evaluation *doLoop =
&doConstructEval->getFirstNestedEvaluation();
@@ -267,6 +285,9 @@ bool ClauseProcessor::processCollapse(
&*std::next(doConstructEval->getNestedEvaluations().begin());
} while (collapseValue > 0);
+ convertLoopBounds(converter, currentLocation, lowerBound, upperBound, step,
+ loopVarTypeSize);
+
return found;
}
@@ -906,16 +927,38 @@ bool ClauseProcessor::processMap(
bool ClauseProcessor::processReduction(
mlir::Location currentLocation,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &reductionVars,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Attribute> &reductionDeclSymbols,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> *reductionSymbols)
- const {
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &outReductionVars,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Type> &outReductionTypes,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Attribute> &outReductionDeclSymbols,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *>
+ *outReductionSymbols) const {
return findRepeatableClause<omp::clause::Reduction>(
[&](const omp::clause::Reduction &clause,
const Fortran::parser::CharBlock &) {
+ // Use local lists of reductions to prevent variables from other
+ // already-processed reduction clauses from impacting this reduction.
+ // For example, the whole `reductionVars` array is queried to decide
+ // whether to do the reduction byref.
+ llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value> reductionVars;
+ llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Attribute> reductionDeclSymbols;
+ llvm::SmallVector<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> reductionSymbols;
ReductionProcessor rp;
rp.addReductionDecl(currentLocation, converter, clause, reductionVars,
- reductionDeclSymbols, reductionSymbols);
+ reductionDeclSymbols,
+ outReductionSymbols ? &reductionSymbols : nullptr);
+
+ // Copy local lists into the output.
+ llvm::copy(reductionVars, std::back_inserter(outReductionVars));
+ llvm::copy(reductionDeclSymbols,
+ std::back_inserter(outReductionDeclSymbols));
+ if (outReductionSymbols)
+ llvm::copy(reductionSymbols,
+ std::back_inserter(*outReductionSymbols));
+
+ outReductionTypes.reserve(outReductionTypes.size() +
+ reductionVars.size());
+ llvm::transform(reductionVars, std::back_inserter(outReductionTypes),
+ [](mlir::Value v) { return v.getType(); });
});
}
diff --git a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/ClauseProcessor.h b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/ClauseProcessor.h
index 3f6adcce8ae877..3f50909fe73abd 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/ClauseProcessor.h
+++ b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/ClauseProcessor.h
@@ -56,14 +56,12 @@ class ClauseProcessor {
clauses(makeList(clauses, semaCtx)) {}
// 'Unique' clauses: They can appear at most once in the clause list.
- bool
- processCollapse(mlir::Location currentLocation,
- Fortran::lower::pft::Evaluation &eval,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &lowerBound,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &upperBound,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &step,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> &iv,
- std::size_t &loopVarTypeSize) const;
+ bool processCollapse(
+ mlir::Location currentLocation, Fortran::lower::pft::Evaluation &eval,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &lowerBound,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &upperBound,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &step,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> &iv) const;
bool processDefault() const;
bool processDevice(Fortran::lower::StatementContext &stmtCtx,
mlir::Value &result) const;
@@ -126,6 +124,7 @@ class ClauseProcessor {
bool
processReduction(mlir::Location currentLocation,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &reductionVars,
+ llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Type> &reductionTypes,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Attribute> &reductionDeclSymbols,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *>
*reductionSymbols = nullptr) const;
diff --git a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/OpenMP.cpp b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/OpenMP.cpp
index eaaa8fcd165a91..2ed1745d95b0dc 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/OpenMP.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/OpenMP.cpp
@@ -214,24 +214,6 @@ static void threadPrivatizeVars(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
firOpBuilder.restoreInsertionPoint(insPt);
}
-static mlir::Type getLoopVarType(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
- std::size_t loopVarTypeSize) {
- // OpenMP runtime requires 32-bit or 64-bit loop variables.
- loopVarTypeSize = loopVarTypeSize * 8;
- if (loopVarTypeSize < 32) {
- loopVarTypeSize = 32;
- } else if (loopVarTypeSize > 64) {
- loopVarTypeSize = 64;
- mlir::emitWarning(converter.getCurrentLocation(),
- "OpenMP loop iteration variable cannot have more than 64 "
- "bits size and will be narrowed into 64 bits.");
- }
- assert((loopVarTypeSize == 32 || loopVarTypeSize == 64) &&
- "OpenMP loop iteration variable size must be transformed into 32-bit "
- "or 64-bit");
- return converter.getFirOpBuilder().getIntegerType(loopVarTypeSize);
-}
-
static mlir::Operation *
createAndSetPrivatizedLoopVar(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
mlir::Location loc, mlir::Value indexVal,
@@ -568,6 +550,7 @@ genParallelOp(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
mlir::omp::ClauseProcBindKindAttr procBindKindAttr;
llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value> allocateOperands, allocatorOperands,
reductionVars;
+ llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Type> reductionTypes;
llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Attribute> reductionDeclSymbols;
llvm::SmallVector<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> reductionSymbols;
@@ -578,13 +561,8 @@ genParallelOp(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
cp.processDefault();
cp.processAllocate(allocatorOperands, allocateOperands);
if (!outerCombined)
- cp.processReduction(currentLocation, reductionVars, reductionDeclSymbols,
- &reductionSymbols);
-
- llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Type> reductionTypes;
- reductionTypes.reserve(reductionVars.size());
- llvm::transform(reductionVars, std::back_inserter(reductionTypes),
- [](mlir::Value v) { return v.getType(); });
+ cp.processReduction(currentLocation, reductionVars, reductionTypes,
+ reductionDeclSymbols, &reductionSymbols);
auto reductionCallback = [&](mlir::Operation *op) {
llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Location> locs(reductionVars.size(),
@@ -1468,25 +1446,6 @@ genOMP(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
standaloneConstruct.u);
}
-static void convertLoopBounds(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
- mlir::Location loc,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &lowerBound,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &upperBound,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Value> &step,
- std::size_t loopVarTypeSize) {
- fir::FirOpBuilder &firOpBuilder = converter.getFirOpBuilder();
- // The types of lower bound, upper bound, and step are converted into the
- // type of the loop variable if necessary.
- mlir::Type loopVarType = getLoopVarType(converter, loopVarTypeSize);
- for (unsigned it = 0; it < (unsigned)lowerBound.size(); it++) {
- lowerBound[it] =
- firOpBuilder.createConvert(loc, loopVarType, lowerBound[it]);
- upperBound[it] =
- firOpBuilder.createConvert(loc, loopVarType, upperBound[it]);
- step[it] = firOpBuilder.createConvert(loc, loopVarType, step[it]);
- }
-}
-
static llvm::SmallVector<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *>
genLoopVars(mlir::Operation *op, Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
mlir::Location &loc,
@@ -1520,7 +1479,7 @@ genLoopAndReductionVars(
mlir::Location &loc,
llvm::ArrayRef<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> loopArgs,
llvm::ArrayRef<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> reductionArgs,
- llvm::SmallVectorImpl<mlir::Type> &reductionTypes) {
+ llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type> reductionTypes) {
fir::FirOpBuilder &firOpBuilder = converter.getFirOpBuilder();
llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Type> blockArgTypes;
@@ -1582,16 +1541,15 @@ createSimdLoop(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value> lowerBound, upperBound, step, reductionVars;
llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value> alignedVars, nontemporalVars;
llvm::SmallVector<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> iv;
+ llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Type> reductionTypes;
llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Attribute> reductionDeclSymbols;
mlir::omp::ClauseOrderKindAttr orderClauseOperand;
mlir::IntegerAttr simdlenClauseOperand, safelenClauseOperand;
- std::size_t loopVarTypeSize;
ClauseProcessor cp(converter, semaCtx, loopOpClauseList);
- cp.processCollapse(loc, eval, lowerBound, upperBound, step, iv,
- loopVarTypeSize);
+ cp.processCollapse(loc, eval, lowerBound, upperBound, step, iv);
cp.processScheduleChunk(stmtCtx, scheduleChunkClauseOperand);
- cp.processReduction(loc, reductionVars, reductionDeclSymbols);
+ cp.processReduction(loc, reductionVars, reductionTypes, reductionDeclSymbols);
cp.processIf(clause::If::DirectiveNameModifier::Simd, ifClauseOperand);
cp.processSimdlen(simdlenClauseOperand);
cp.processSafelen(safelenClauseOperand);
@@ -1601,9 +1559,6 @@ createSimdLoop(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
Fortran::parser::OmpClause::Nontemporal,
Fortran::parser::OmpClause::Order>(loc, ompDirective);
- convertLoopBounds(converter, loc, lowerBound, upperBound, step,
- loopVarTypeSize);
-
mlir::TypeRange resultType;
auto simdLoopOp = firOpBuilder.create<mlir::omp::SimdLoopOp>(
loc, resultType, lowerBound, upperBound, step, alignedVars,
@@ -1641,6 +1596,7 @@ static void createWsLoop(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value> lowerBound, upperBound, step, reductionVars;
llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value> linearVars, linearStepVars;
llvm::SmallVector<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> iv;
+ llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Type> reductionTypes;
llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Attribute> reductionDeclSymbols;
llvm::SmallVector<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *> reductionSymbols;
mlir::omp::ClauseOrderKindAttr orderClauseOperand;
@@ -1648,20 +1604,15 @@ static void createWsLoop(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
mlir::UnitAttr nowaitClauseOperand, byrefOperand, scheduleSimdClauseOperand;
mlir::IntegerAttr orderedClauseOperand;
mlir::omp::ScheduleModifierAttr scheduleModClauseOperand;
- std::size_t loopVarTypeSize;
ClauseProcessor cp(converter, semaCtx, beginClauseList);
- cp.processCollapse(loc, eval, lowerBound, upperBound, step, iv,
- loopVarTypeSize);
+ cp.processCollapse(loc, eval, lowerBound, upperBound, step, iv);
cp.processScheduleChunk(stmtCtx, scheduleChunkClauseOperand);
- cp.processReduction(loc, reductionVars, reductionDeclSymbols,
+ cp.processReduction(loc, reductionVars, reductionTypes, reductionDeclSymbols,
&reductionSymbols);
cp.processTODO<Fortran::parser::OmpClause::Linear,
Fortran::parser::OmpClause::Order>(loc, ompDirective);
- convertLoopBounds(converter, loc, lowerBound, upperBound, step,
- loopVarTypeSize);
-
if (ReductionProcessor::doReductionByRef(reductionVars))
byrefOperand = firOpBuilder.getUnitAttr();
@@ -1702,11 +1653,6 @@ static void createWsLoop(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
auto *nestedEval = getCollapsedLoopEval(
eval, Fortran::lower::getCollapseValue(beginClauseList));
- llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Type> reductionTypes;
- reductionTypes.reserve(reductionVars.size());
- llvm::transform(reductionVars, std::back_inserter(reductionTypes),
- [](mlir::Value v) { return v.getType(); });
-
auto ivCallback = [&](mlir::Operation *op) {
return genLoopAndReductionVars(op, converter, loc, iv, reductionSymbols,
reductionTypes);
diff --git a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/Utils.cpp b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/Utils.cpp
index fa4a51e3384837..b9c0660aa4da8e 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/Utils.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/Utils.cpp
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <flang/Lower/AbstractConverter.h>
#include <flang/Lower/ConvertType.h>
+#include <flang/Optimizer/Builder/FIRBuilder.h>
#include <flang/Parser/parse-tree.h>
#include <flang/Parser/tools.h>
#include <flang/Semantics/tools.h>
@@ -70,6 +71,24 @@ void genObjectList2(const Fortran::parser::OmpObjectList &objectList,
}
}
+mlir::Type getLoopVarType(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
+ std::size_t loopVarTypeSize) {
+ // OpenMP runtime requires 32-bit or 64-bit loop variables.
+ loopVarTypeSize = loopVarTypeSize * 8;
+ if (loopVarTypeSize < 32) {
+ loopVarTypeSize = 32;
+ } else if (loopVarTypeSize > 64) {
+ loopVarTypeSize = 64;
+ mlir::emitWarning(converter.getCurrentLocation(),
+ "OpenMP loop iteration variable cannot have more than 64 "
+ "bits size and will be narrowed into 64 bits.");
+ }
+ assert((loopVarTypeSize == 32 || loopVarTypeSize == 64) &&
+ "OpenMP loop iteration variable size must be transformed into 32-bit "
+ "or 64-bit");
+ return converter.getFirOpBuilder().getIntegerType(loopVarTypeSize);
+}
+
void gatherFuncAndVarSyms(
const ObjectList &objects, mlir::omp::DeclareTargetCaptureClause clause,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<DeclareTargetCapturePair> &symbolAndClause) {
diff --git a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/Utils.h b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/Utils.h
index 3ab0823a462148..4074bf73987d5b 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/Utils.h
+++ b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/Utils.h
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ createMapInfoOp(fir::FirOpBuilder &builder, mlir::Location loc,
mlir::omp::VariableCaptureKind mapCaptureType, mlir::Type retTy,
bool isVal = false);
+mlir::Type getLoopVarType(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
+ std::size_t loopVarTypeSize);
+
void gatherFuncAndVarSyms(
const ObjectList &objects, mlir::omp::DeclareTargetCaptureClause clause,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<DeclareTargetCapturePair> &symbolAndClause);
|
tblah
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2024
…nto the ClauseProcessor (llvm#85258)" This patch contains slight modifications to the reverted PR llvm#85258 to avoid issues with constructs containing multiple reduction clauses, uncovered by a test on the gfortran testsuite. This reverts commit 9f80444.
skatrak
force-pushed
the
fix-clauseprocessor-helpers
branch
from
49caecb to
3913d9b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the work on this refactor. I missed #85258, but went through this one, and looks good.
kparzysz
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2024
It happened for cases such as Looking into a solution, I noticed that the whole list of |
skatrak
added a commit
to ROCm/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
- Cherry-pick some unit test fixes from PR #44. - Cherry-pick reduction processing fix from PR llvm#85807. - Update argument lists of modified functions. - Rewrite `ReductionProcessor::addReductionSym` based on new clause structures. - Remove leftover references to `RIManager`. - Op renames to match new approach. Co-authored-by: Jan Leyonberg <[email protected]>
chencha3
pushed a commit
to chencha3/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2024
…nto the ClauseProcessor (llvm#85258)" (llvm#85807) This patch contains slight modifications to the reverted PR llvm#85258 to avoid issues with constructs containing multiple reduction clauses, uncovered by a test on the gfortran testsuite. This reverts commit 9f80444.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This patch contains slight modifications to the reverted PR #85258 to avoid issues with constructs containing multiple reduction clauses, uncovered by a test on the gfortran testsuite.
This reverts commit 9f80444.