-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
[cross-project-tests] Use "is" instead of "==" to check for None #94016
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
85990bc
to
4f968ef
Compare
4f968ef
to
73a316d
Compare
4ff2405
to
447b138
Compare
447b138
to
af90ab2
Compare
af90ab2
to
b7b57d4
Compare
b7b57d4
to
ea086bd
Compare
ea086bd
to
d678e72
Compare
from PEP8 (https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/#programming-recommendations): > Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with is or > is not, never the equality operators.
d678e72
to
39202c7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@e-kwsm Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR. Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues. How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
…m#94016) From PEP8 (https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/#programming-recommendations): > Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with is or is not, never the equality operators.
from PEP8 (https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/#programming-recommendations):