-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
[AArch64] All bits of an exact right shift are demanded #97448
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
momchil-velikov
merged 2 commits into
llvm:main
from
momchil-velikov:ashr-exact-demanded-bits
Jul 5, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ | ||
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5 | ||
; RUN: llc < %s | FileCheck %s | ||
target triple = "aarch64-linux" | ||
|
||
define <2 x i32> @f(i8 %0, i8 %1) { | ||
; CHECK-LABEL: f: | ||
; CHECK: // %bb.0: | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: movi v0.2d, #0000000000000000 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: mov v0.b[3], w0 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: mov v0.b[7], w1 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: sshr v0.2s, v0.2s, #24 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret | ||
%3 = insertelement <2 x i8> poison, i8 %0, i64 0 | ||
%4 = insertelement <2 x i8> %3, i8 %1, i64 1 | ||
%5 = shufflevector <2 x i8> %4, <2 x i8> <i8 0, i8 poison>, <8 x i32> <i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 0, i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 1> | ||
%6 = bitcast <8 x i8> %5 to <2 x i32> | ||
%7 = ashr exact <2 x i32> %6, <i32 24, i32 24> | ||
ret <2 x i32> %7 | ||
} | ||
|
||
define <2 x i32> @g(i8 %0, i8 %1) { | ||
; CHECK-LABEL: g: | ||
; CHECK: // %bb.0: | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: movi v0.2d, #0000000000000000 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: mov v0.b[3], w0 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: mov v0.b[7], w1 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: ushr v0.2s, v0.2s, #24 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret | ||
%3 = insertelement <2 x i8> poison, i8 %0, i64 0 | ||
%4 = insertelement <2 x i8> %3, i8 %1, i64 1 | ||
%5 = shufflevector <2 x i8> %4, <2 x i8> <i8 0, i8 poison>, <8 x i32> <i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 0, i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 1> | ||
%6 = bitcast <8 x i8> %5 to <2 x i32> | ||
%7 = lshr exact <2 x i32> %6, <i32 24, i32 24> | ||
ret <2 x i32> %7 | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: perhaps elaborate a bit on why the shifted out bits matter. E.g. "because we may fold the right shift with other instructions and thus require the lower bits to be set."
Now that gets me thinking. Wouldn't this condition than make code that does not fold the right shift with other instructions less efficient? Shouldn't the onus be on wherever folds right shift with sitofp (scvtf) to make sure to clear the lower bits?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Somehow didn't send this out before -- posting for posterity.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wrote that in the commit message