Skip to content

[Issue] Issue #13952 - Duplicate orders with same Quote Id at same time with few time difference. #35833

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
4 of 5 tasks
m2-assistant bot opened this issue Jul 28, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed
4 of 5 tasks
Labels
Area: Order Component: Quote Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: done Reported on 2.4.x Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S1 Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.

Comments

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Jul 28, 2022

This issue is automatically created based on existing pull request: #35139: Issue #13952 - Duplicate orders with same Quote Id at same time with few time difference.


Description (*)

Two different orders have been placed with very few seconds as time difference with same quote Id.

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

  1. Fixes Duplicate orders with same Quote Id at same time with few time difference. #13952

Manual testing scenarios (*)

  1. Login as a User
  2. Add items to cart and proceed through checkout.
  3. Select Any payment method. Not click on place order button
  4. Now login to the same account in another system.
  5. And proceed to checkout with the same items. Not click on place order button.
  6. Now you have to click on place order at the same time with both the systems.
  7. one of the screen must return failed
    image

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • README.md files for modified modules are updated and included in the pull request if any README.md predefined sections require an update
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds are green)
@m2-assistant
Copy link
Author

m2-assistant bot commented Jul 28, 2022

Hi @engcom-Lima. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!

  • 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

  • 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@engcom-Alfa
Copy link
Contributor

As tested and mentioned in the PR_comment, confirming this issue!

@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa added Reported on 2.4.x Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Area: Order Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed labels Jul 28, 2022
@github-jira-sync-bot
Copy link

✅ Jira issue https://jira.corp.adobe.com/browse/AC-6057 is successfully created for this GitHub issue.

@m2-assistant
Copy link
Author

m2-assistant bot commented Jul 28, 2022

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-Alfa. Thank you for verifying the issue.
Issue Available: @engcom-Alfa, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa added the Priority: P1 Once P0 defects have been fixed, a defect having this priority is the next candidate for fixing. label Jul 28, 2022
@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot added Progress: PR in progress Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Severity: S1 Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround. labels Jul 28, 2022
@engcom-Lima engcom-Lima removed their assignment Jul 28, 2022
@sdzhepa sdzhepa removed the Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. label Jul 28, 2022
@github-jira-sync-bot github-jira-sync-bot added Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. and removed Priority: P1 Once P0 defects have been fixed, a defect having this priority is the next candidate for fixing. labels Aug 31, 2022
@github-jira-sync-bot github-jira-sync-bot added Progress: PR Created Indicates that Pull Request has been created to fix issue Progress: dev in progress labels Oct 17, 2022
@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot removed Progress: PR Created Indicates that Pull Request has been created to fix issue Progress: PR in progress labels Oct 17, 2022
@github-jira-sync-bot github-jira-sync-bot added Progress: PR Created Indicates that Pull Request has been created to fix issue and removed Progress: dev in progress labels Oct 21, 2022
@engcom-Hotel
Copy link
Contributor

Hello,

As I can see this issue got fixed in the scope of the internal Jira ticket AC-6057 by the internal team
Related commits: https://github.com/magento/magento2/search?q=AC-6057&type=commits

Based on the Jira ticket, the target version is 2.4.6.

Thanks

@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot added Progress: done and removed Progress: PR Created Indicates that Pull Request has been created to fix issue labels Nov 15, 2022
@kanhaiya5590
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @engcom-Hotel,

What is the solution for the lower version (< 2.4.6.) of Magento?

If there also same issue, any solution for that or any Magento patch, we can use.

@Vitancourt
Copy link

Vitancourt commented May 3, 2023

Hello @engcom-Hotel, is there a patch for versions < 2.4.6?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Order Component: Quote Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: done Reported on 2.4.x Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S1 Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
Projects
Archived in project
7 participants