Skip to content

Conversation

rspencer01
Copy link
Collaborator

This addresses #107 by adding some strict formatting and lints, using ruff.

This PR touches many lines in the project and there may be a concern that this "clobbers" history. However, the history is always there, even if its not one step away. Further the advantages of having a consistently formatted and linted codebase are considerable going forward.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 3, 2024

Coverage Status

coverage: 87.377% (-0.07%) from 87.444%
when pulling 9051791 on rspencer01:ruffen
into 6d5c501 on man-group:master.

While this is valid in python3.10 and greater, we are building on
python3.8 in tests and can't put it in brackets as that forms a tuple.
@morotti morotti self-requested a review September 5, 2024 12:12
@rspencer01 rspencer01 merged commit b7e27aa into man-group:master Sep 5, 2024
3 checks passed
@rspencer01 rspencer01 deleted the ruffen branch September 5, 2024 12:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants