Skip to content

Conversation

UziTech
Copy link
Member

@UziTech UziTech commented Aug 13, 2025

Marked version: 16.1.2

Description

Add def token and renderer as an empty string.

This will allow extensions that need to know where the defs are in the markdown.

Contributor

  • Test(s) exist to ensure functionality and minimize regression (if no tests added, list tests covering this PR); or,
  • no tests required for this PR.
  • If submitting new feature, it has been documented in the appropriate places.

Committer

In most cases, this should be a different person than the contributor.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 13, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
marked-website Ready Preview Comment Aug 13, 2025 0:36am

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @UziTech, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces support for a new 'def' (definition) token type within the markdown parsing and rendering library. It updates the parser to recognize and process this new token, and adds a corresponding renderer method that, for now, outputs an empty string. This lays the groundwork for future definition list or similar markdown features.

Highlights

  • New Token Type Support: Integrated a new 'def' token type into the parser's token handling logic.
  • Renderer Extension: Added a dedicated def method to the renderer, which currently produces an empty string output for 'def' tokens.
  • Lexer Token Collection: Ensured that link tokens are explicitly pushed to the token array in the lexer, potentially improving token collection consistency.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds support for def tokens in the token stream and a renderer for them. The implementation looks correct and follows the existing patterns in the codebase. I've added one critical comment regarding the need to update the test suite to reflect these changes. Once the tests are updated, this should be good to merge.

@UziTech UziTech marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2025 00:53
@UziTech UziTech assigned styfle and calculuschild and unassigned styfle and calculuschild Aug 13, 2025
@calculuschild
Copy link
Contributor

calculuschild commented Aug 16, 2025

This looks straightforward enough.

My one comment is if this would work better using the preprocess hook or something.

Defs can occur after the line where the corresponding link is rendered. This currently works fine because Defs sre parsed first as part of the "block" pass, and links later during the "inline" pass.

However if this is to support extensions, I could see users wanting to have access to the set of Def tokens as a precursor to everything everything else so they could also be referenced in any block-level extensions. (I actually do this myself for one of my extensions that extends links) That would be a bigger refactor though.

@UziTech
Copy link
Member Author

UziTech commented Aug 16, 2025

Ya that would be a much bigger refactor. Def tokens are already parsed they just aren't added to the tokens and there is no renderer for them (since they usually aren't rendered anyways)

@UziTech UziTech merged commit 0769124 into markedjs:master Aug 18, 2025
8 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2025
# [16.2.0](v16.1.2...v16.2.0) (2025-08-18)

### Features

* add def token in tokens and renderer ([#3745](#3745)) ([0769124](0769124))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants